Provided by: amanda-server_2.4.5p1-2_i386 bug

NAME

       amtapetype - generate a tapetype definition.

SYNOPSIS

       amtapetype [-h] [-c] [-o] [-b blocksize] [-e estsize] [-f tapedev]
                  [-t typename]

DESCRIPTION

       amtapetype generates a tapetype entry for AMANDA.

OPTIONS

       -h     Display an help message.

       -c     Run only the hardware compression detection heuristic  test  and
              stop. This takes a few minutes only.

       -o     Overwrite the tape, even if it’s an AMANDA tape.

       -b  blocksize
              record block size (default: 32k)

       -e  estsize
              estimated tape size (default: 1g == 1024m)

       -f  tapedev
              tape  device  name  (default:  $TAPE)  The device to perform the
              test.

       -t  typename
              tapetype name (default: unknown-tapetype)

EXAMPLE

       Generate a tapetype definition for your tape device:

       % amtapetype -f /dev/nst0

NOTES

       Hardware  compression  is  detected  by  measuring  the  writing  speed
       difference of the tape drive when writing an amount of compressable and
       uncompresseable data. It does not rely on the status bits of  the  tape
       drive  or  the OS parameters. If your tape drive has very large buffers
       or is very fast, the program could fail to detect hardware  compression
       status reliably.

       During  the  first pass, it writes files that are estimated to be 1% of
       the expected tape capacity. It gets the expected capacity from  the  -e
       command  line  flag,  or defaults to 1 GByte. In a perfect world (which
       means there is zero chance of this  happening  with  tapes  :-),  there
       would be 100 files and 100 file marks.

       During  the  second  pass,  the  file size is cut in half. In that same
       fairyland world, this means 200 files and 200 file marks.

       In both passes the total amount of data written is summed  as  well  as
       the  number  of  file  marks  written.  At  the end of the second pass,
       quoting from the code:

       * Compute the size of a filemark as  the  difference  in  data  written
       between  pass  1 and pass 2 divided by the difference in number of file
       marks written between pass 1 and pass 2. ... *

       So if we wrote 1.0 GBytes on the first pass and 100 file marks, and 0.9
       GBytes  on  the  second  pass with 200 file marks, those additional 100
       file marks in the second pass took 0.1 GBytes and therefor a file  mark
       is 0.001 GBytes (1 MByte).

       Note  that  if  the  estimated  capacity  is wrong, the only thing that
       happens is a lot more (or less, but unlikely)  files,  and  thus,  file
       marks,  get written. But the math still works out the same. The -e flag
       is there to keep the number of file marks down because they can be slow
       (since  they  force  the  drive  to  flush  all its buffers to physical
       media).

       All sorts of things might happen to cause the amount of data written to
       vary enough to generate a big file mark size guess. A little more "shoe
       shining" because of the additional file marks (and flushes), dirt  left
       on   the   heads  from  the  first  pass  of  a  brand  new  tape,  the
       temperature/humidity changed during the  multi-hour  run,  a  different
       amount  of  data  was  written  after the last file mark before EOT was
       reported, etc.

       Note that the file mark size might really be zero for  whatever  device
       this  is,  and  it was just the measured capacity variation that caused
       amtapetype to think those extra file marks in pass 2 actually  took  up
       space.

       It  also  explains  why  amtapetype used to sometimes report a negative
       file mark size if the math happened to  end  up  that  way.  When  that
       happens now we just report it as zero.

SEE ALSO

       amanda(8)

                                                                 AMTAPETYPE(8)