Provided by: libguestfs0_1.40.2-7ubuntu5_amd64 
名前
guestfs-security - security of libguestfs
説明
This manual page discusses security implications of using libguestfs, particularly with
untrusted or malicious guests or disk images.
REPORTING SECURITY PROBLEMS
If you wish to privately report a security issue, please follow the Red Hat security
procedure at https://access.redhat.com/security/team/contact
If the security problem is not so serious, you can simply file a bug (see "BUGS" below),
or send an email to our mailing list (https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs).
You do not need to subscribe to the mailing list to send email, but there will be a delay
while the message is moderated.
GENERAL ISSUES
Security of mounting filesystems
You should never mount an untrusted guest filesystem directly on your host kernel (eg.
using loopback or kpartx).
When you mount a filesystem, mistakes in the kernel filesystem (VFS) can be escalated
into exploits by attackers creating a malicious filesystem. These exploits are very
severe for two reasons. Firstly there are very many filesystem drivers in the kernel, and
many of them are infrequently used and not much developer attention has been paid to the
code. Linux userspace helps potential crackers by detecting the filesystem type and
automatically choosing the right VFS driver, even if that filesystem type is unexpected.
Secondly, a kernel-level exploit is like a local root exploit (worse in some ways), giving
immediate and total access to the system right down to the hardware level.
These exploits can be present in the kernel for a very long time
(https://lwn.net/Articles/538898/).
Libguestfs provides a layered approach to protecting you from exploits:
untrusted filesystem
--------------------------------------
appliance kernel
--------------------------------------
qemu process running as non-root
--------------------------------------
sVirt [if using libvirt + SELinux]
--------------------------------------
host kernel
We run a Linux kernel inside a qemu virtual machine, usually running as a non-root user.
The attacker would need to write a filesystem which first exploited the kernel, and then
exploited either qemu virtualization (eg. a faulty qemu driver) or the libguestfs
protocol, and finally to be as serious as the host kernel exploit it would need to
escalate its privileges to root. Additionally if you use the libvirt back end and
SELinux, sVirt is used to confine the qemu process. This multi-step escalation, performed
by a static piece of data, is thought to be extremely hard to do, although we never say
‘never’ about security issues.
Callers can also reduce the attack surface by forcing the filesystem type when mounting
(use "guestfs_mount_vfs" in guestfs(3)).
General security considerations
Be careful with any files or data that you download from a guest (by "download" we mean
not just the "guestfs_download" in guestfs(3) command but any command that reads files,
filenames, directories or anything else from a disk image). An attacker could manipulate
the data to fool your program into doing the wrong thing. Consider cases such as:
• データ（ファイルなど）が存在しない場合
• 存在するが空の場合
• 通常よりもかなり大きい場合
• 任意の 8 ビットのデータを含む場合
• 予期しない文字エンコードを使用している場合
• 同型異義語を含む場合
Protocol security
プロトコルは、定義されたメッセージ上限容量を持つ RFC 4506 (XDR) に基づき、セキュアであるよ
うに設計されています。しかしながら、libguestfs を使用するプログラムは気をつけなければいけ
ません - たとえば、ディスクイメージからバイナリーをダウンロードして、ローカルに実行するプ
ログラムを書くことができます。また、多くのプロトコルセキュリティは結果からあなたを保護しま
せん。
Inspection security
Parts of the inspection API (see "INSPECTION" in guestfs(3)) return untrusted strings
directly from the guest, and these could contain any 8 bit data. Callers should be
careful to escape these before printing them to a structured file (for example, use HTML
escaping if creating a web page).
Guest configuration may be altered in unusual ways by the administrator of the virtual
machine, and may not reflect reality (particularly for untrusted or actively malicious
guests). For example we parse the hostname from configuration files like
/etc/sysconfig/network that we find in the guest, but the guest administrator can easily
manipulate these files to provide the wrong hostname.
The inspection API parses guest configuration using two external libraries: Augeas (Linux
configuration) and hivex (Windows Registry). Both are designed to be robust in the face
of malicious data, although denial of service attacks are still possible, for example with
oversized configuration files.
Running untrusted guest commands
Be very cautious about running commands from the guest. By running a command in the
guest, you are giving CPU time to a binary that you do not control, under the same user
account as the library, albeit wrapped in qemu virtualization. More information and
alternatives can be found in "RUNNING COMMANDS" in guestfs(3).
HISTORICAL SECURITY ISSUES IN LIBGUESTFS
CVE-2010-3851
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/642934
このセキュリティバグは、QEMU のディスクイメージでないことをディスクの自動フォーマット検出
に関するものです。
A raw disk image is just the raw bytes, there is no header. Other disk images like qcow2
contain a special header. Qemu deals with this by looking for one of the known headers,
and if none is found then assuming the disk image must be raw.
This allows a guest which has been given a raw disk image to write some other header. At
next boot (or when the disk image is accessed by libguestfs) qemu would do autodetection
and think the disk image format was, say, qcow2 based on the header written by the guest.
This in itself would not be a problem, but qcow2 offers many features, one of which is to
allow a disk image to refer to another image (called the "backing disk"). It does this by
placing the path to the backing disk into the qcow2 header. This path is not validated
and could point to any host file (eg. "/etc/passwd"). The backing disk is then exposed
through "holes" in the qcow2 disk image, which of course is completely under the control
of the attacker.
In libguestfs this is rather hard to exploit except under two circumstances:
1. ネットワークを有効化しているか、もしくは書き込みモードでディスクを開いています。
2. You are also running untrusted code from the guest (see "RUNNING COMMANDS" in
guestfs(3)).
The way to avoid this is to specify the expected disk format when adding disks (the
optional "format" option to "guestfs_add_drive_opts" in guestfs(3)). You should always do
this if the disk is raw format, and it’s a good idea for other cases too. (See also "DISK
IMAGE FORMATS" in guestfs(3)).
For disks added from libvirt using calls like "guestfs_add_domain" in guestfs(3), the
format is fetched from libvirt and passed through.
For libguestfs tools, use the --format command line parameter as appropriate.
CVE-2011-4127
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/752375
This is a bug in the kernel which allowed guests to overwrite parts of the host’s drives
which they should not normally have access to.
It is sufficient to update libguestfs to any version ≥ 1.16 which contains a change that
mitigates the problem.
CVE-2012-2690
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/831117
Old versions of both virt-edit and the guestfish "edit" command created a new file
containing the changes but did not set the permissions, etc of the new file to match the
old one. The result of this was that if you edited a security sensitive file such as
/etc/shadow then it would be left world-readable after the edit.
It is sufficient to update libguestfs to any version ≥ 1.16.
CVE-2013-2124
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/968306
This security bug was a flaw in inspection where an untrusted guest using a specially
crafted file in the guest OS could cause a double-free in the C library (denial of
service).
It is sufficient to update libguestfs to a version that is not vulnerable: libguestfs ≥
1.20.8, ≥ 1.22.2 or ≥ 1.23.2.
CVE-2013-4419
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1016960
When using the guestfish(1) --remote or guestfish --listen options, guestfish would create
a socket in a known location (/tmp/.guestfish-$UID/socket-$PID).
The location has to be a known one in order for both ends to communicate. However no
checking was done that the containing directory (/tmp/.guestfish-$UID) is owned by the
user. Thus another user could create this directory and potentially hijack sockets owned
by another user’s guestfish client or server.
It is sufficient to update libguestfs to a version that is not vulnerable: libguestfs ≥
1.20.12, ≥ 1.22.7 or ≥ 1.24.
Denial of service when inspecting disk images with corrupt btrfs volumes
It was possible to crash libguestfs (and programs that use libguestfs as a library) by
presenting a disk image containing a corrupt btrfs volume.
This was caused by a NULL pointer dereference causing a denial of service, and is not
thought to be exploitable any further.
See commit d70ceb4cbea165c960710576efac5a5716055486 for the fix. This fix is included in
libguestfs stable branches ≥ 1.26.0, ≥ 1.24.6 and ≥ 1.22.8, and also in RHEL ≥ 7.0.
Earlier versions of libguestfs are not vulnerable.
CVE-2014-0191
Libguestfs previously used unsafe libxml2 APIs for parsing libvirt XML. These APIs
defaulted to allowing network connections to be made when certain XML documents were
presented. Using a malformed XML document it was also possible to exhaust all CPU, memory
or file descriptors on the machine.
Since the libvirt XML comes from a trusted source (the libvirt daemon) it is not thought
that this could have been exploitable.
This was fixed in libguestfs ≥ 1.27.9 and the fix was backported to stable versions ≥
1.26.2, ≥ 1.24.9, ≥ 1.22.10 and ≥ 1.20.13.
Shellshock (bash CVE-2014-6271)
This bash bug indirectly affects libguestfs. For more information see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2014-September/msg00252.html
CVE-2014-8484
CVE-2014-8485
These two bugs in binutils affect the GNU strings(1) program, and thus the
"guestfs_strings" in guestfs(3) and "guestfs_strings_e" in guestfs(3) APIs in libguestfs.
Running strings on an untrusted file could cause arbitrary code execution (confined to the
libguestfs appliance).
In libguestfs ≥ 1.29.5 and ≥ 1.28.3, libguestfs uses the "strings" -a option to avoid BFD
parsing on the file.
CVE-2015-5745
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251157
This is not a vulnerability in libguestfs, but because we always give a virtio-serial port
to each guest (since that is how guest-host communication happens), an escalation from the
appliance to the host qemu process is possible. This could affect you if:
• your libguestfs program runs untrusted programs out of the guest (using "guestfs_sh"
in guestfs(3) etc), or
• another exploit was found in (for example) kernel filesystem code that allowed a
malformed filesystem to take over the appliance.
If you use sVirt to confine qemu, that would thwart some attacks.
Permissions of .ssh and .ssh/authorized_keys
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1260778
The tools virt-customize(1), virt-sysprep(1) and virt-builder(1) have an --ssh-inject
option for injecting an SSH key into virtual machine disk images. They may create a
~user/.ssh directory and ~user/.ssh/authorized_keys file in the guest to do this.
In libguestfs < 1.31.5 and libguestfs < 1.30.2, the new directory and file would get mode
0755 and mode 0644 respectively. However these permissions (especially for ~user/.ssh)
are wider than the permissions that OpenSSH uses. In current libguestfs, the directory
and file are created with mode 0700 and mode 0600.
CVE-2015-8869
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/CVE-2015-8869
This vulnerability in OCaml might affect virt tools written in the OCaml programming
language. It affects only 64 bit platforms. Because this bug affects code generation it
is difficult to predict which precise software could be affected, and therefore our
recommendation is that you recompile libguestfs using a version of the OCaml compiler
where this bug has been fixed (or ask your Linux distro to do the same).
CVE-2017-5208, CVE-2017-5331, CVE-2017-5332, CVE-2017-5333, CVE-2017-6009, CVE-2017-6010,
CVE-2017-6011
Multiple vulnerabilities in the wrestool(1) program in the "icoutils" package can be
exploited for local code execution on the host.
When libguestfs inspection (see "Inspection security" above) detects a Windows XP or
Windows 7 guest and is asked to find an associated icon for the guest, it will download an
untrusted file from the guest and run "wrestool -x" on that file. This can lead to local
code execution on the host. Any disk image or guest can be crafted to look like a Windows
guest to libguestfs inspection, so just because you do not have Windows guests does not
help.
Any program calling the libguestfs API "guestfs_inspect_get_icon" could be vulnerable.
This includes virt-inspector(1) and virt-manager(1).
The solution is to update to the non-vulnerable version of icoutils (at least 0.31.1).
CVE-2017-7244, CVE-2017-7245, CVE-2017-7246
Multiple vulnerabilities in PCRE could be exploited to crash libguestfs (ie. cause a
denial of service) when performing inspection on an untrusted virtual machine.
The solution is to update to a version of PCRE with these bugs fixed (upstream version ≥
8.41).
CVE-2018-11806
Vulnerabilities affecting qemu user networking (SLIRP) allow a malicious filesystem image
to take control of qemu and from there attack the host.
This affects libguestfs when the backend is set to "direct" and networking is enabled.
The direct backend is the default upstream, but not in some downstream Linux distributions
including Fedora, Red Hat Enterprise Linux and CentOS. It might also have been selected
if you set the "LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct" environment variable or called
"guestfs_set_backend (g, "direct")".
Networking is enabled automatically by some tools (eg. virt-builder(1)), or is enabled if
your code called "guestfs_set_network (g, 1)" (which is not the default).
The libvirt backend is not affected.
The solution is to update qemu to a version containing the fix (see
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg01012.html).
関連項目
guestfs(3), guestfs-internals(1), guestfs-release-notes(1), guestfs-testing(1),
http://libguestfs.org/.
著者
Richard W.M. Jones ("rjones at redhat dot com")
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (C) 2009-2019 Red Hat Inc.
LICENSE
BUGS
To get a list of bugs against libguestfs, use this link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=libguestfs&product=Virtualization+Tools
To report a new bug against libguestfs, use this link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?component=libguestfs&product=Virtualization+Tools
When reporting a bug, please supply:
• The version of libguestfs.
• Where you got libguestfs (eg. which Linux distro, compiled from source, etc)
• Describe the bug accurately and give a way to reproduce it.
• Run libguestfs-test-tool(1) and paste the complete, unedited output into the bug
report.