bionic (3) critcl_usingit.3tcl.gz
NAME
critcl_use - Using Critcl
DESCRIPTION
Welcome to the C Runtime In Tcl, CriTcl for short, a system to build C extension packages for Tcl on the
fly, from C code embedded within Tcl scripts, for all who wish to make their code go faster.
This document is a (hopefully) gentle introduction to Critcl by way of a series of small examples.
Readers which came directly to this document through a search or similar, and are thus in need of an
overview of the whole system, are advised to read the Introduction To CriTcl first.
The examples here cover both how to embed C into Tcl with it, and how to build the distributable
packages. As such the intended audience are both writers of packages with embedded C, and people
building such packages. To make things easier the two themes each have their own section in this
document, enabling all readers to quickly skip the part they are not interested in.
The sources of Critcl, should you have gotten them, contain several larger examples show-casing various
aspects of the system. These demonstration packages can all be found in the sub-directory "examples/" of
the sources.
EMBEDDING C
This is the section for developers writing, or wishing to write, a package embedding C into Tcl via
critcl.
I guess that we are allowed to asssume that you, gentle reader, are here because you have written some
Tcl code which is not fast enough (any more) and you wish to make it "go faster" by replacing parts (or
all) of it with speedy C.
Another, and I believe reasonable assumption to make would be that you have already investigated and
ruled out or done things like changes to data structures and algorithms which reduce O(n*n) work to O
(n*log n), O(n), or even O(1). Of course, nothing prevents you from forging ahead here even if you have
not done such. Still, even in that case I would recommend that you consider investigating this line of
making your code go faster as well.
Now, with these introductory words out of the way, lets jump into the meat of things.
A SIMPLE PROCEDURE
Starting simple, let us assume that the Tcl code in question is something like
proc math {x y z} {
return [expr {(sin($x)*rand())/$y**log($z)}]
}
with the expression pretending to be something very complex and slow. Converting this to C we get:
package require critcl
critcl::cproc math {double x double y double z} double {
double up = rand () * sin (x);
double down = pow(y, log (z);
return up/down;
}
Notable about this translation:
[1] All the arguments got type information added to them, here "double". Like in C the type precedes
the argument name. Other than that it is pretty much a Tcl dictionary, with keys and values
swapped.
[2] We now also have to declare the type of the result, here "double", again.
[3] The reference manpage lists all the legal C types supported as arguments and results.
HANDLING A VARIABLE NUMBER OF ARGUMENTS
In A Simple Procedure we demonstrated how easy a translation to C can be. Is it still as easy when we
introduce something moderately complex like handling a variable number of arguments ? A feature which is
needed to handle commands with options and optional arguments ? Unfortunately not. We can use
critcl::cproc only if the number of arguments is known beforehand, i.e. at the time of declaration. This
of course also means that they do not support default arguments either.
Thus, to handle something like the example below
proc math {args} {
set sum 0
foreach y { set sum [expr {$sum + $y}] }
return $sum
}
we have to use critcl::ccommand instead.
Its advantage: Access to the low-level C arguments representing the Tcl arguments of the command. That
allows things like variable number of arguments, optional arguments, options, etc.
Its disadvantage: Access to the low-level C arguments representing the Tcl arguments of the command.
Where critcl::cproc handles the task of converting from Tcl to C values (for arguments) and back (for the
result), with critcl::commands we have to do this on our own.
Here is the translation of the example:
package require critcl
critcl::ccommand math {cd ip oc ov} {
double sum = 0;
double y;
while (oc) {
if (Tcl_GetDoubleFromObj (ip, ov[oc], &y) != TCL_OK) {
return TCL_ERROR;
}
sum += y;
oc --;
}
Tcl_SetObjResult (ip, Tcl_NewDoubleObj (sum));
return TCL_OK:
}
Notable about this translation:
[1] As promised/threatened, all the conversions between the Tcl and C domains are exposed, and the
developer should know her way around Tcl's C API.
[2] The four arguments "cd ip oc ov" are our names for the low-level arguments holding
[1] ClientData (reference)
[2] Tcl_Interp (reference)
[3] Number of arguments, and
[4] Array of argument values, each a Tcl_Obj*.
This list of arguments, while not optional in itself, is allowed to be empty, and/or to contain
empty strings as argument names. If we do that critcl will supply standard names for the missing
pieces, namely:
[1] clientdata
[2] interp
[3] objc
[4] objv
DATA AS A TCL COMMAND
Here we assume that we have a Tcl procedure which returns a fixed string. In the final product we are
going to C to hide this string from the casual user.
proc somedata {} {
return {... A large blob of characters ...}
}
The translation of this is simple and easy:
package require critcl
critcl::cdata somedata {... A large blob of characters ...}
There is nothing really notable here.
BLOCKS OF ARBITRARY C
Often just defining Tcl commands in C, as demonstrated in the sections A Simple Procedure, Handling A
Variable Number Of Arguments, and Data As A Tcl Command is not really enough. For example we may have
several of our new C commands using the same code over and over, and we wish avoid this duplication. Or
we wish to pull in declarations and definitions from some external library.
In both cases we require the ability to embed an unstructured block of C code which can contain whatever
we want, defines, functions, includes, etc. without being directly tied to Tcl commands. The command
critcl::code provides us with exactly that. As our example now an excerpt taken from real code, the top
of the "sha1c.tcl" critcl file in the sha1 module of Tcllib:
critcl::ccode {
#include "sha1.h"
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
static
Tcl_ObjType sha1_type; /* fast internal access representation */
static void
sha1_free_rep(Tcl_Obj* obj)
{
SHA1_CTX* mp = (SHA1_CTX*) obj->internalRep.otherValuePtr;
Tcl_Free(mp);
}
...
}
We see here the beginning of the C code defining a custom Tcl_ObjType holding the data of a SHA1 context
used during the incremental calculation of sha1 hashes.
LIFTING CONSTANTS
When writing a critcl-based package to make a third-party library available to scripts we do not only
have to make the relevant functions available as commands, often we also have to know all the various
constants, flags, etc. these functions take.
Rather than writing such magic numbers directly we would greatly prefer to use symbolic names instead.
Instead of providing one or more commands to list and map the magic numbers to strings critcl only
provides a single command which allows the export of C defines and enumeration values, mapping them to
Tcl variables of the given names, whose values are the associated magic numbers.
This is good enough because the developers of the third-party library were very likely like us and wanted
to use symbolic names instead of magic numbers. Which in C are declared as via defines and enumeration
types. We just have to lift them up.
Our example comes from cryptkit, a Tcl binding to cryptlib, a cryptography library. The command
critcl::cdefines CRYPT_* ::crypt
maps all Cryptlib specific #defines and enums into the namespace ::crypt, telling critcl to create
aliases to the symbols.
Similarly
critcl::cdefines {
NULL
TRUE
FALSE
TCL_OK
TCL_ERROR
} ::crypt
maps the listed defines into the namespace ::crypt.
An important thing to note: These commands do not create the defines in the C level. They only lift pre-
existing material. Which can come from the headers of the third-party library, the usual case, but also
from Blocks of arbitrary C.
A corrollary to the above: What is not where, cannot be lifted. All listed names and patterns which have
no actual C code declaring them are ignored, i.e. not mapped.
FINDING HEADER FILES
A notable thing in the example shown in the section about Blocks of arbitrary C is the
#include "sha1.h"
statement. Where does this header come from ? Looking at the Tcllib module we will find that the header
is actually a sibling to the "sha1c.tcl" file containing the embedded C code. However, critcl does not
know that. It has to be told. While without that knowledge it will invoke the compiler just fine, the
compilation will fail because the header is not on the include paths used by the compiler, and therefore
will not be found.
For this we have the critcl::cheaders command. It enables us to either tell the compiler the path(s)
where the required headers can be found, using
critcl::cheaders -I/path/to/headers/
or to tell it directly which headers we are using and where they live:
critcl::cheaders sha1.h
And now critcl knows that "sha1.h" is important, and that it lives besides the ".critcl" file which
referenced it (because of the relative path used). Note that this doesn't absolve us of the need to
"#include" the header through a critcl::ccode block. This only tells critcl where it lives so that it can
configure the compiler with the proper include paths to actually find it on use.
Further note that a C development environment is usually configured to find all the system headers,
obviating the need for a critcl::cheaders declaration when such are used. For these a plain "#include" in
a critcl::ccode block is good enough. In other words, the second form of invoking critcl::cheaders is
pretty much only for headers which accompany the ".critcl" file.
SEPARATE C SOURCES
In all of the examples shown so far the C code was fully embedded in a ".critcl" file. However, if the C
part is large it can make sense to break it out of the ".critcl" file into one or more separate proper
".c" file(s).
The critcl::csources command can then be used to make this code known to the original ".critcl" file
again. This command accepts the paths to the ".c" files as arguments, and glob patterns as well. Our
example comes from the struct::graph package in Tcllib. Its core C functions are in separate files, and
the ".critcl" code then makes them known via:
namespace eval ::struct {
# Supporting code for the main command.
critcl::cheaders graph/*.h
critcl::csources graph/*.c
...
}
which tells critcl that these files are in the subdirectory "graph" relative to the location of
"graph_c.tcl", which is the relevant ".critcl" file.
This example also demonstrates again the use of critcl::cheaders, which we also saw in section Finding
header files.
FINDING EXTERNAL LIBRARIES
When creating a package exposing some third-party library to Tcl Finding header files is only the first
part, to enable failure-free compilation. We also have to find the library/ies themselves so that they
can be linked to our package. This is described here. The last issue, Lifting constants from C to Tcl for
the use by scripts is handled in a separate section and example.
The relevant command is critcl::clibraries. Its basic semantics are like that of critcl::cheaders, i.e.
It enables us to tell the linker the path(s) where the required libraries can be found, using
critcl::clibraries -L/path/to/libraries/
name them
critcl::clibraries -lfoo
or tell it directly which libraries we are using and where they live:
critcl::clibraries /path/to/library/foo.so
This last way of using should be avoided however, as it intermingles searching and naming, plus the name
is platform dependent.
For OS X we additionally have the critcl::framework command which enables us to name the frameworks used
by our package. Note that this command can be used unconditionally. If the build target is not OS X it
is ignored.
CUSTOMIZING THE COMPILE AND LINK STEPS
The commands critcl::cflags and critcl::ldflags enable you to provide custom options to the compile and
link phases for a ".critcl" file.
This usually becomes necessary if the C code in question comes from an external library we are writing a
Tcl binding for, with multiple configurations to select, non-standard header locations, and other things.
Among the latter, especially platform-specific settings, for example byteorder.
This makes critcl::check an important adjunct command, as this is the API for Checking The Environment,
and then selecting the compile & link flags to use.
I currently have no specific example to demonstrate these commands.
HAVING BOTH C AND TCL FUNCTIONALITY
Often enough only pieces of a package require recoding in C to boost the whole system. Or, alternatively,
the package in question consists of a low-level layer C with a Tcl layer above encoding policies and
routing to the proper low-level calls, creating a nicer (high-level) API to the low-level functionality,
etc.
For all of this we have to be able to write a package which contains both C and Tcl, nevermind the fact
the C parts are embedded in Tcl.
The easiest way to structure such a package is to have several files, each with a different duty. First,
a ".critcl" file containing the embedded C, and second one or more ".tcl" files providing the Tcl parts.
Then use the critcl::tsources command in the ".critcl" file to link the two parts together, declaring the
".tcl" files as necessary companions of the C part.
package require critcl
critcl::tsources your-companion.tcl ; # Companion file to use
... embedded C via critcl commands ...
With a declaration as shown above the companion file will be automatically sourced when the C parts are
made available, thus making the Tcl parts available as well.
USING C WITH TCL FUNCTIONALITY AS FALLBACK
There is one special case of Having both C and Tcl functionality which deserves its own section.
The possibility of not having the fast C code on some platform, and using a slower Tcl implementation of
the functionality. In other words, a fallback which keeps the package working in the face of failure to
build the C parts. A more concrete example of this would be a module implementing the SHA hash, in both C
and Tcl, and using the latter if and only if the C implementation is not available.
There two major possibilities in handling such a situation.
[1] Keep all the pieces separated. In that scenario our concrete example would be spread over three
packages. Two low-level packages sha::c and sha::tcl containing the two implementations of the
algorithm, and, thirdly, a coordinator package sha which loads either of them, based on
availability.
The Tcllib bundle of packages contains a number of packages structured in this manner, mostly in
the struct module.
Writing the C and Tcl parts should be simple by now, with all the examples we had so far. The only
non-trivial part is the coordinator, and even that if and only if we wish to make it easy to write
a testsuite which can check both branches, C, and Tcl without gymnastics. So, the most basic
coordinator would be
set sha::version 1
if {[catch {
package require sha::c $sha::version
}]} {
package require sha::tcl $sha::version
}
package provide sha $sha::version
It tries to load the C implementation first, and falls back to the Tcl implementation if that
fails. The code as is assumes that both implementations create exactly the same command names,
leaving the caller unaware of the choice of implementations.
A concrete example of this scheme can be found in Tcllib's md5 package. While it actually uses
ythe Trf as its accelerator, and not a critcl-based package the principle is the same. It also
demonstrates the need for additional glue code when the C implementation doesn't exactly match the
signature and semantics of the Tcl implementation.
This basic coordinator can be easily extended to try more than two packages to get the needed
implementation. for example, the C implementation may not just exist in a sha::c package, but also
bundled somewhere else. Tcllib, for example, has a tcllibc package which bundles all the C parts
of its packages which have them in a single binary.
Another direction to take it in is to write code which allows the loading of multiple
implementations at the same time, and then switching between them at runtime. Doing this requires
effort to keep the implementations out of each others way, i.e. they cannot provide the same
command names anymore, and a more complex coordinator as well, which is able to map from the
public command names to whatever is provided by the implementation.
The main benefit of this extension is that it makes testing the two different implementations
easier, simply run through the same set of tests multiple times, each time with different
implementation active. The disadvantage is the additional complexity of the coordinator's
internals. As a larger example of this technique here is the coordinator
"modules/struct/queue.tcl" handling the C and Tcl implementations of Tcllib's struct::queue
package:
# queue.tcl --
# Implementation of a queue data structure for Tcl.
package require Tcl 8.4
namespace eval ::struct::queue {}
## Management of queue implementations.
# ::struct::queue::LoadAccelerator --
# Loads a named implementation, if possible.
proc ::struct::queue::LoadAccelerator {key} {
variable accel
set r 0
switch -exact -- $key {
critcl {
# Critcl implementation of queue requires Tcl 8.4.
if {![package vsatisfies [package provide Tcl] 8.4]} {return 0}
if {[catch {package require tcllibc}]} {return 0}
set r [llength [info commands ::struct::queue_critcl]]
}
tcl {
variable selfdir
if {
[package vsatisfies [package provide Tcl] 8.5] &&
![catch {package require TclOO}]
} {
source [file join $selfdir queue_oo.tcl]
} else {
source [file join $selfdir queue_tcl.tcl]
}
set r 1
}
default {
return -code error "invalid accelerator/impl. package $key: must be one of [join [KnownImplementations] {, }]"
}
}
set accel($key) $r
return $r
}
# ::struct::queue::SwitchTo --
# Activates a loaded named implementation.
proc ::struct::queue::SwitchTo {key} {
variable accel
variable loaded
if {[string equal $key $loaded]} {
# No change, nothing to do.
return
} elseif {![string equal $key ""]} {
# Validate the target implementation of the switch.
if {![info exists accel($key)]} {
return -code error "Unable to activate unknown implementation \"$key\""
} elseif {![info exists accel($key)] || !$accel($key)} {
return -code error "Unable to activate missing implementation \"$key\""
}
}
# Deactivate the previous implementation, if there was any.
if {![string equal $loaded ""]} {
rename ::struct::queue ::struct::queue_$loaded
}
# Activate the new implementation, if there is any.
if {![string equal $key ""]} {
rename ::struct::queue_$key ::struct::queue
}
# Remember the active implementation, for deactivation by future
# switches.
set loaded $key
return
}
# ::struct::queue::Implementations --
# Determines which implementations are
# present, i.e. loaded.
proc ::struct::queue::Implementations {} {
variable accel
set res {}
foreach n [array names accel] {
if {!$accel($n)} continue
lappend res $n
}
return $res
}
# ::struct::queue::KnownImplementations --
# Determines which implementations are known
# as possible implementations.
proc ::struct::queue::KnownImplementations {} {
return {critcl tcl}
}
proc ::struct::queue::Names {} {
return {
critcl {tcllibc based}
tcl {pure Tcl}
}
}
## Initialization: Data structures.
namespace eval ::struct::queue {
variable selfdir [file dirname [info script]]
variable accel
array set accel {tcl 0 critcl 0}
variable loaded {}
}
## Initialization: Choose an implementation,
## most preferred first. Loads only one of the
## possible implementations. And activates it.
namespace eval ::struct::queue {
variable e
foreach e [KnownImplementations] {
if {[LoadAccelerator $e]} {
SwitchTo $e
break
}
}
unset e
}
## Ready
namespace eval ::struct {
# Export the constructor command.
namespace export queue
}
package provide struct::queue 1.4.2
In this implementation the coordinator renames the commands of the low-level packages to the
public commands, making the future dispatch as fast as if the commands had these names anyway, but
also forcing a spike of bytecode recompilation if switching is ever done at the runtime of an
application, and not just used for testing, and possibly disrupting introspection by the commands,
especially if they move between different namespaces.
A different implementation would be to provide the public commands as procedures which consult a
variable to determine which of the loaded implementations is active, and then call on its
commands. This doesn't disrupt introspection, nor does it trigger bytecode recompilation on
switching. But it takes more time to dispatch to the actual implementation, in every call of the
public API for the package in question.
A concrete example of this scheme can be found in Tcllib's crc32 package.
[2] Mix the pieces together. Please note that while I am describing how to make this work I strongly
prefer and recommend to use the previously shown approach using separate files/packages. It is
much easier to understand and maintain. With this warning done, lets go into the nuts and bolts.
If we care only about mode "compile & run" things are easy:
package require critcl
if {![critcl::compiling]} {
proc mycommand {...} {
...
}
} else {
critcl::cproc mycommand {...} {
...
}
}
The command critcl::compiling tells us whether we have a compiler available or not, and in the
latter case we implement our command in Tcl.
Now what happens when we invoke mode "generate package" ? ... compiler failure ... ... ok - C
code - everything fine ... fail - no package ? or just no C code ? declare self as tsource, to be
used ? ... platform-specific C/Tcl -- uuid.
UNLAZY PACKAGES
By default critcl is a bit inconsistent between modes "compile & run" and "generate package". The result
of the latter is a standard Tcl package which loads and sources all of its files immediately when it is
required. Whereas "compile & run" defers actual compilation, linking, and loading until the first time
one of the declared commands is actually used, making this very lazy.
This behaviour can be quite unwanted if Tcl companion files, or other users of the C commands use
introspection to determine the features they have available. Just using [info commands] doesn't cut it,
the auto_index array has to be checked as well, making things quite inconvenient for the users.
To fix this issue at the source, instead of in each user, be it inside of the package itself, or other
packages, we have the command critcl::load. Used as the last command in a ".critcl" file it forces the
compile, link, and load trinity, ensuring that all C commands are available immediately.
package require critcl
... Declare C procedures, commands, etc.
critcl::load ; # Force build and loading.
Note that is not allowed, nor possible to use critcl commands declaring anything after critcl::load has
been called. I.e., code like
package require critcl
... Declare C procedures, commands, etc.
critcl::load ; # Force build and loading.
... More declarations of C code, ...
critcl::code { ... }
will result in an error. The only package-related commands still allowed are
[1] critcl::done
[2] critcl::failed
[3] critcl::load
as these only query information, namely the build status, and are protected against multiple calls.
CHECKING YOUR C
As said several times, by default critcl defers the compile and link steps for a file until it is needed,
i.e. the first command of the ".critcl" file in question is actually invoked.
This not only has the effect of lazily loading the package's functionality, but also, when developing
using mode "compile & run", of us not seeing any errors in our code until we are actually trying to run
some demonstration.
If we do not wish to have such a delay we have to be able to force at least the execution of the compile
step.
The command critcl::failed is exactly that. When called it forcibly builds the C code for the ".critcl"
file it is part of, and returns a boolean vlaue signaling failure (true), or success (false).
package require critcl
... Declare C procedures, commands, etc.
if {[critcl::failed]} {
... signal error
}
It is related and similar to critcl::load, the command to overcome the lazy loading, as shown in section
Unlazy Packages.
Like it is not allowed, nor possible to use critcl commands declaring anything after critcl::failed has
been called, making it pretty much the last critcl command in a ".critcl" file. Code like
package require critcl
... Declare C procedures, commands, etc.
if {[critcl::failed]} { ... }
... More declarations of C code, ...
critcl::code { ... }
will result in an error. The only package-related commands still allowed are
[1] critcl::done
[2] critcl::failed
[3] critcl::load
as these only query information, namely the build status, and are protected against multiple calls.
WHICH TCL ?
When building the shared library from the embedded C sources one of the things critcl does for us is to
provide the Tcl headers, especially the stubs declarations.
By default these are the Tcl 8.4 headers and stubs, which covers 90% of the cases. What when the package
in question is meant for use with Tcl 8.5 or higher, using C-level features of this version of Tcl.
Use the critcl::tcl command to declare to critcl the minimum version of Tcl required to operate the
package. This can be either 8.4, 8.5, or 8.6, and critcl then supplies the proper headers and stubs.
package require critcl
critcl::tcl 8.5
... Declare your code ...
MAKING A WIDGET
... requires compiling against the Tk headers, and linking with Tk's stubs. For our convenience we have a
simple, single command to activate all the necessary machinery, with critcl supplying the header files
and stubs C code, instead of having to make it work on our own via critcl::cflags, critcl::ldflags,
critcl::cheaders, critcl::csources.
This command is critcl::tk.
package require critcl
critcl::tk ; # And now critcl knows to put in the Tk headers and other support.
... Declare your code ...
Please note that this doesn't release you from the necessity of learning Tk's C API and how to use it to
make a widget work. Sorry.
CHECKING THE ENVIRONMENT
... may be necessary when creating a binding to some third-party library. The headers for this library
may be found in non-standard locations, ditto for the library/ies itself. We may not have the headers
and/or library on the build host. Types with platform-dependent sizes and definitions. Endianness issues.
Any number of things.
TEA-based packages can use autoconf and various predefined macros to deal with all this. We have the
Power Of Tcl (tm) and critcl::check.
This command takes a piece of C code as argument, like critcl::ccode. Instead of saving it for later it
however tries to compile it immediately, using the current settings, and then returns a boolean value
reporting on the success (true) or failure (false). From there we can then branch to different
declarations.
As example let us check for the existence of some header "FOO.h":
package require critcl
if {[critcl::check {
#include <FOO.h>
}]} {
... Code for when FOO.h is present.
} else {
... Code for when FOO.h is not present.
}
Should we, on the other hand, wish to search for the header ourselves, in non-standard locations we have
the full power of Tcl available, i.e. loops, the file and glob commands, etc., which can then be followed
by a critcl::cheader command to declare the location we found (See also Finding header files).
A nice extension to critcl would be a package collecting pocedures for common tasks like that, sort of
like an autoconf for Tcl. critcl::config seems to be nice name for such a package.
Obvious adjunct commands which can be driven by results from critcl::check are
critcl::cflags
critcl::cheaders
critcl::clibraries
critcl::framework
critcl::ldflags
Less obvious, yet still valid are also
critcl::ccode
critcl::ccommand
critcl::cdata
critcl::cproc
critcl::csources
critcl::ctsources
and pretty much everything else you can imagine.
LICENSE INVOKED
When writing packages it is always good manners to provide prospective users with the license the package
is under, so that they can decide whether they truly want to use the package, or not.
As critcl-based packages often consist of only a single file a nice way of doing that is to embed the
license in that file. By using a critcl command, namely critcl::license this information is then also
available to the critcl application, which can put it into a standard location, i.e. "license.terms", of
the generated packages.
I currently have no specific example to demonstrate the command.
BUILDING CRITCL PACKAGES
This is the section for developers having to generate packages from ".critcl" files, i.e binaries for
deployment,
GETTING HELP ...
... Is easy. Running
critcl -help
prints the basics of using the application to stdout.
PRE-FILLING THE RESULT CACHE
The default mode of the critcl application is to take a series of ".critcl" files, build their binaries,
and leave them behind in the result cache. When the files are later actually used the compile and link
steps can be skipped, leading to shorter load times.
The command line for this is
critcl foo.tcl
or, to process multiple files
critcl foo.tcl bar.tcl ...
One thing to be aware of, should critcl find that the cache already contains the results for the input
files, no building will be done. If you are sure that these results are outdated use the option -force to
force(sic!) critcl to rebuild the binaries.
critcl -force foo.tcl
For debugging purposes it may be handy to see the generated intermediate ".c" files as well. Their
removal from the cache can be prevented by specifying the option -keep.
critcl -keep foo.tcl
These can be combined, of course.
BUILDING A PACKAGE
To build the binary package for a ".critcl" file, instead of Pre-Filling The Result Cache, simply specify
the option -pkg.
critcl -pkg foo.tcl
This will geneate a package named foo. A simpler alternative to the above is
critcl -pkg foo
The application will automatically assume that the input file to look for is "foo.tcl".
But what when the name of the input file is not the name of the package to build ? This we can handle as
well:
critcl -pkg foo bar.tcl
The argument foo specifies the name, and "bar.tcl" is the file to process.
Going back to the very first example, it is of course possible to use an absolute path to specify the
file to process:
critcl -pkg /path/to/foo.tcl
The package name derived from that is still foo.
BUILDING AND INSTALLING A PACKAGE
Here we assume that you know the basics of how to build a package. If not, please read section Building
A Package first.
By default critcl will place all newly-made packages in the subdirectory "lib" of the current working
directory. I.e. running
critcl -pkg foo
will create the directory "lib/foo" which contains all the files of the package.
When this behaviour is unwanted the option -libdir is available, allowing the explicit specification of
the destination location to use.
critcl -pkg -libdir /path/to/packages foo
A common use might be to not only build the package in question, but to also immediately install it
directly in the path where the user's tclsh will be able to find it. Assuming, for example, that the
tclsh in question is installed at "/path/to/bin/tclsh", with the packages searched for under
"/path/to/lib" ([info library]), the command
critcl -pkg -libdir /path/to/lib foo
will build the package and place it in the directory "/path/to/lib/foo".
BUILDING FOR DEBUGGING
Here we assume that you know the basics of how to build a package. If not, please read section Building
A Package first.
An important issue, when there is trouble with the package, debugging becomes necessary a evil. Critcl
supports this through the -debug option. Using it enables various build modes which help with that.
For example, to activate the Tcl core's built-in memory debugging subsystem build your package with
critcl -pkg -debug memory foo
The resulting binary for package foo will use Tcl's debug-enabled (de)allocation functions, making them
visible to Tcl's memory command. This of course assumes that the Tcl core used was also built for memory
debugging.
Further, built your package with
critcl -pkg -debug symbols foo
to see the foo's symbols (types, functions, variables, etc.) when inspecting a "core" file it is
involved in with a symbolic debugger,
To activate both memory debugging and symbols use either
critcl -pkg -debug all foo
or
critcl -pkg -debug symbols -debug memory foo
RETARGETING THE BINARIES
The configuration settings critcl uses to drive the compiler, linker, etc. are by default selected based
on the platform it is run on, to generate binaries which properly work on this platform.
There is one main use-case for overriding this selection, which is done with the option -target:
[1] Cross-compilation. The building of binaries for a platform T while critcl actually runs on
platform B. The standard configuration of critcl currently has settings for two cross-compilation
targets. So, to build 32bit Windows binaries on a Linux host which has the Xmingw cross-
compilation development environment installed use
critcl -pkg -target mingw32 foo
Similarly, building a package for use on ARM processors while critcl is running in an Intel
environment use
critcl -pkg -target linux-arm foo
Note that both configurations assume that the cross-compiling compiler, linke, etc. are found
first in the PATH.
CUSTOM CONFIGURATIONS
The compiler configurations coming with critcl currently cover all hosts having gcc installed (the
foremost among these are Linux and OS X), plus the native compilers of the more common unix-like
operating systems, i.e. Solaris, HP-UX, and AIX, and, on the non-unix side, Windows.
Developers using operating systems and compilers outside of this range will either have to install a gcc-
based development environment, i.e. get into the covered range, or write their own custom configuration
and then tell critcl about it.
The latter is the easier part, given that critcl supports the option -config whose argument is the path
to the file containing the custom configuration(s). I.e.
critcl -config /path/to/config ...
will run critcl with the custom configuration in "/path/to/config", with the other options and arguments
as explained in previous sections. Depending on the choice of name for the new configuration(s) this may
or may not require a -target option to select the configuration needed.
For the former, the writing of the custom configuration, the reader is refered to the section
"Configuration Internals" of the CriTcl Package Reference for the necessary details. This is an advanced
topic pretty much out of scope for this tutorial beyond what was already said.
CUSTOM HEADER PATH
Sometimes the use of critcl::headers might not be enough for a package to find its headers. Maybe they
are outside of the paths checked by the setup code. To help the application recognizes the option -I
which allows the user to supply a single additional include path to use during the build phase of the
package.
Simply use
critcl -I /path/to/header ...
and the specified header will be handed to the package to be built.
INTROSPECTION OF TARGETS AND CONFIGURATIONS
To see a list containing the names of all the available configurations, run
critcl -targets
The configuration settings for either the default or user-chosen target can be inspected on stdout with
critcl -show
and
critcl -show -target TARGET
The raw contents of the configuration file used by critcl are dumped to stdout with
critcl -showall
All of the above can of course be combined with custom configuration files.
AUTHORS
Jean Claude Wippler, Steve Landers, Andreas Kupries
BUGS, IDEAS, FEEDBACK
This document, and the package it describes, will undoubtedly contain bugs and other problems. Please
report them at https://github.com/andreas-kupries/critcl/issues. Ideas for enhancements you may have for
either package, application, and/or the documentation are also very welcome and should be reported at
https://github.com/andreas-kupries/critcl/issues as well.
KEYWORDS
C code, Embedded C Code, code generator, compile & run, compiler, dynamic code generation, dynamic
compilation, generate package, linker, on demand compilation, on-the-fly compilation
CATEGORY
Glueing/Embedded C code
COPYRIGHT
Copyright (c) Jean-Claude Wippler
Copyright (c) Steve Landers
Copyright (c) 2011-2013 Andreas Kupries