Provided by: libtest-lectrotest-perl_0.5001-3_all 
NAME
Test::LectroTest::Property - Properties that make testable claims about your software
VERSION
version 0.5001
SYNOPSIS
use MyModule; # provides my_function_to_test
use Test::LectroTest::Generator qw( :common );
use Test::LectroTest::Property qw( Test );
use Test::LectroTest::TestRunner;
my $prop_non_neg = Property {
##[ x <- Int, y <- Int ]##
$tcon->label("negative") if $x < 0;
$tcon->label("odd") if $x % 2;
$tcon->retry if $y == 0; # 0 can't be used in test
my_function_to_test( $x, $y ) >= 0;
}, name => "my_function_to_test output is non-negative";
my $runner = Test::LectroTest::TestRunner->new();
$runner->run_suite(
$prop_non_neg,
# ... more properties here ...
);
DESCRIPTION
STOP! If you're just looking for an easy way to write and run unit tests, see
Test::LectroTest first. Once you're comfortable with what is presented there and ready to
delve into the full offerings of properties, this is the document for you.
This module allows you to define Properties that can be checked automatically by
Test::LectroTest. A Property is a specification of your software's required behavior over
a given set of conditions. The set of conditions is given by a generator-binding
specification. The required behavior is defined implicitly by a block of code that tests
your software for a given set of generated conditions; if your software matches the
expected behavor, the block of code returns true; otherwise, false.
This documentation serves as reference documentation for LectroTest Properties. If you
don't understand the basics of Properties yet, see "OVERVIEW" in
Test::LectroTest::Tutorial before continuing.
Two ways to create Properties
There are two ways to create a property:
1. Use the "Property" function to promote a block of code that contains both a generator-
binding specification and a behavior test into a Test::LectroTest::Property object.
This is the preferred method. Example:
my $prop1 = Property {
##[ x <- Int ]##
thing_to_test($x) >= 0;
}, name => "thing_to_test is non-negative";
2. Use the "new" method of Test::LectroTest::Property and provide it with the necessary
ingredients via named parameters:
my $prop2 = Test::LectroTest::Property->new(
inputs => [ x => Int ],
test => sub { my ($tcon,$x) = @_;
thing_to_test($x) >= 0 },
name => "thing_to_test is non-negative"
);
Both are equivalent, but the first is concise, easier to read, and lets LectroTest do some
of the heavy lifting for you. The second is probably better, however, if you are
constructing property specifications programmatically.
Generator-binding specification
The generator-binding specification declares that certain variables are to be bound to
certain kinds of random-value generators during the tests of your software's behavior.
The number and kind of generators define the "condition space" that is examined during
property checks.
If you use the "Property" function to create your properties, your generator-binding
specification must come first in your code block, and you must use the following syntax:
##[ var1 <- gen1, var2 <- gen2, ... ]##
Comments are not allowed within the specification, but you may break it across multiple
lines:
##[ var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
]##
or
##[
var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
]##
Further, for better integration with syntax-highlighting IDEs, the terminating "]##"
delimiter may be preceded by a hash symbol "#" and optional whitespace to make it appear
like a comment:
##[
var1 <- gen1,
var2 <- gen2, ...
# ]##
On the other hand, if you use "Test::LectroTest::Property->new()" to create your objects,
the generator-binding specification takes the form of an array reference containing
variable-generator pairs that is passed to "new()" via the parameter named "inputs":
inputs => [ var1 => gen1, var2 => gen2, ... ]
Normal Perl syntax applies here.
Specifying multiple sets of generator bindings
Sometimes you may want to repeat a property check with multiple sets of generator
bindings. This can happen, for instance, when your condition space is vast and you want
to ensure that a particular portion of it receives focused coverage while still sampling
the overall space. For times like this, you can list multiple sets of bindings within the
"##[" and "]##" delimiters, like so:
##[ var1 <- gen1A, ... ],
[ var1 <- gen1B, ... ],
... more sets of bindings ...
[ var1 <- gen1N, ... ]##
Note that only the first and last set need the special delimiters.
The equivalent when using "new()" is as follows:
inputs => [ [ var1 => gen1A, ... ],
[ var1 => gen1B, ... ],
...
[ var1 => gen1N, ... ] ]
Regardless of how you declare the sets of bindings, each set must provide bindings for the
exact same set of variables. (The generators, of course, can be different.) For example,
this kind of thing is illegal:
##[ x <- Int ], [ y <- Int ]##
The above is illegal because both sets of bindings must use x or both must use y; they
can't each use a different variable.
##[ x <- Int ],
[ x <- Int, y <- Float ]##
The above is illegal because the second set has an extra variable that isn't present in
the first. Both sets must use exactly the same variables. None of the variables may be
extra, none may be missing, and all must be named identically across the sets of bindings.
Behavior test
The behavior test is a subroutine that accepts a test-controller object and a given set of
input conditions, tests your software's observed behavior against the required behavior
with respect to the input conditions, and returns true or false to indicate acceptance or
rejection. If you are using the "Property" function to create your property objects,
lexically bound variables are created and loaded with values automatically, per your
input-generator specification, so you can just go ahead and use the variables immediately:
my $prop = Property {
##[ i <- Int, delta <- Float(range=>[0,1]) ]##
my $lo_val = my_thing_to_test($i);
my $hi_val = my_thing_to_test($i + $delta);
$lo_val == $hi_val;
}, name => "my_thing_to_test ignores fractions" ;
On the other hand, if you are using "Test::LectroTest::Property->new()", you must declare
and initialize these variables manually from Perl's @_ variable in lexicographically
increasing order after receiving $tcon, the test controller object. (This inconvenience,
by the way, is why the former method is preferred.) The hard way:
my $prop = Test::LectroTest::Property->new(
inputs => [ i => Int, delta => Float(range=>[0,1]) ],
test => sub {
my ($tcon, $delta, $i) = @_;
my $lo_val = my_thing_to_test($i);
my $hi_val = my_thing_to_test($i + $delta);
$lo_val == $hi_val
},
name => "my_thing_to_test ignores fractions"
) ;
Control logic, retries, and labeling
Inside the behavior test, you have access to a special variable $tcon that allows you to
interact with the test controller. Through $tcon you can do the following:
• retry the current trial with different inputs (if you don't like the inputs you were
given at first)
• add labels to the current trial for reporting purposes
• attach notes and variable dumps to the current trial for diagnostic purposes, should
the trial fail
(For the full details of what you can do with $tcon see the "testcontroller" section of
Test::LectroTest::TestRunner.)
For example, let's say that we have written a function "my_sqrt" that returns the square
root of its input. In order to check whether our implementation fulfills the mathematical
definition of square root, we might specify the following property:
my $epsilon = 0.000_001;
Property {
##[ x <- Float ]##
return $tcon->retry if $x < 0;
$tcon->label("less than one") if $x < 1;
my $sx = my_sqrt( $x );
abs($sx * $sx - $x) < $epsilon;
}, name => "my_sqrt satisfies defn of square root";
Because we don't want to deal with imaginary numbers, our square-root function is defined
only over non-negative numbers. To make sure we don't accidentally check our property
"at" a negative number, we use the following line to re-start the trial with a different
input should the input we are given at first be negative:
return $tcon->retry if $x < 0;
An interesting fact is that for all values x between zero and one, the square root of x is
larger than x itself. Perhaps our implementation treats such values as a special case.
In order to be confident that we are checking this case, we added the following line:
$tcon->label("less than one") if $x < 1;
In the property-check output, we can see what percentage of the trials checked this case:
1..1
ok 1 - 'my_sqrt satisfies defn of square root' (1000 attempts)
# 1% less than one
Trivial cases
Random-input generators may create some inputs that are trivial and don't provide much
testing value. To make it easy to label such cases, you can use the following from within
your behavior tests:
$tcon->trivial if ... ;
The above is exactly equivalent to the following:
$tcon->label("trivial") if ... ;
SEE ALSO
Test::LectroTest::Generator describes the many generators and generator combinators that
you can use to define the test or condition spaces that you want LectroTest to search for
bugs.
Test::LectroTest::TestRunner describes the objects that check your properties and tells
you how to turn their control knobs. You'll want to look here if you're interested in
customizing the testing procedure.
HERE BE SOURCE FILTERS
The special syntax used to specify generator bindings relies upon a source filter (see
Filter::Util::Call). If you don't want to use the syntax, you can disable the filter like
so:
use Test::LectroTest::Property qw( NO_FILTER );
AUTHOR
Tom Moertel (tom@moertel.com)
INSPIRATION
The LectroTest project was inspired by Haskell's QuickCheck module by Koen Claessen and
John Hughes: http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/QuickCheck/.
COPYRIGHT and LICENSE
Copyright (c) 2004-13 by Thomas G Moertel. All rights reserved.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same
terms as Perl itself.