Provided by: duma_2.5.15-2build1_amd64 bug

NAME

       DUMA - DUMA Malloc Debugger

SYNOPSIS

       #include <stdlib.h>

       void * malloc (size_t size);

       void free (void *ptr);

       void * realloc (void *ptr, size_t size);

       void * calloc (size_t nelem, size_t elsize);

       void * memalign (size_t alignment, size_t size);

       void * valloc (size_t size);

       extern int DUMA_ALIGNMENT;

       extern int DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW;

       extern int DUMA_PROTECT_FREE;

       extern int DUMA_ALLOW_MALLOC_0;

       extern int DUMA_FILL;

DESCRIPTION

       DUMA  helps  you  detect two common programming bugs: software that overruns the boundaries of a malloc()
       memory allocation, and software that touches a memory allocation that has been released by free(). Unlike
       other malloc() debuggers, DUMA will detect read accesses as well as writes,  and  it  will  pinpoint  the
       exact  instruction  that causes an error. It has been in use at Pixar since 1987, and at many other sites
       for years.

       DUMA uses the virtual memory hardware of your computer to place an inaccessible memory  page  immediately
       after  (or  before,  at  the  user's  option)  each memory allocation. When software reads or writes this
       inaccessible page, the hardware issues a segmentation  fault,  stopping  the  program  at  the  offending
       instruction.  It  is  then  trivial  to  find  the erroneous statement using your favorite debugger. In a
       similar manner, memory that has been released by free() is made inaccessible, and any code  that  touches
       it will get a segmentation fault.

       Simply  linking your application with libduma.a will allow you to detect most, but not all, malloc buffer
       overruns and accesses of free memory.  If you want to be reasonably sure that you've found  all  bugs  of
       this type, you'll have to read and understand the rest of this man page.

USAGE

       Link  your  program  with  the  library  libduma.a  .   Make  sure  you  are  not  linking with -lmalloc,
       -lmallocdebug, or with other malloc-debugger or malloc-enhancer libraries.  You can only  use  one  at  a
       time.   If  your system administrator has installed DUMA for public use, you'll be able to use the -lduma
       argument to the linker, otherwise you'll have to put the path-name for libduma.a in the linker's  command
       line.   You  can  also  use  dynamic  linking.  If  you're  using  a  Bourne  shell, the statement export
       LD_PRELOAD=libduma.so.0.0 will cause DUMA to be loaded to run all dynamic executables.  The command  duma
       command runs a single command under DUMA.

       Some  systems will require special arguments to the linker to assure that you are using the DUMA malloc()
       and not the one from your C library.

       Run your program using a debugger.  It's easier to work this way than to create a  core  file  and  post-
       mortem  debug  it.  DUMA  can  create  huge core files, and some operating systems will thus take minutes
       simply to dump core! Some operating systems will not create usable core  files  from  programs  that  are
       linked  with  DUMA.   If  your program has one of the errors detected by DUMA, it will get a segmentation
       fault (SIGSEGV) at the offending instruction. Use the debugger to locate  the  erroneous  statement,  and
       repair it.

GLOBAL AND ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES

       DUMA  has  four  configuration  switches that can be enabled via the shell environment, or by setting the
       value of global integer variables using a debugger. These switches change what bugs DUMA will detect,  so
       it's important that you know how to use them.

       DUMA_ALIGNMENT
              This  is  an integer that specifies the alignment for any memory allocations that will be returned
              by malloc(), calloc(), and realloc().  The value is specified in bytes, thus a  value  of  4  will
              cause  memory  to  be  aligned  to  32-bit  boundaries  unless  your  system  doesn't have a 8-bit
              characters. DUMA_ALIGNMENT is set to sizeof(int) by default, since that is generally the word-size
              of your CPU.  If your program requires that allocations be aligned to 64-bit  boundaries  and  you
              have  a  32-bit  int  you'll have to set this value to 8. This is the case when compiling with the
              -mips2 flag on MIPS-based systems such as those from SGI.  The memory allocation that is  returned
              by  DUMA  malloc() is aligned using the value in DUMA_ALIGNMENT, and its size the multiple of that
              value that is greater than or equal to the requested size.  For this reason,  you  will  sometimes
              want  to set DUMA_ALIGNMENT to 0 (no alignment), so that you can detect overruns of less than your
              CPU's word size. Be sure to read the section WORD-ALIGNMENT AND OVERRUN DETECTION in  this  manual
              page before you try this.  To change this value, set DUMA_ALIGNMENT in the shell environment to an
              integer value, or assign to the global integer variable DUMA_ALIGNMENT using a debugger.

       DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW
              DUMA  usually  places  an  inaccessible  page  immediately  after  each memory allocation, so that
              software that runs past the end of the allocation will be detected. Setting DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW  to
              1  causes  DUMA to place the inaccessible page before the allocation in the address space, so that
              under-runs  will  be  detected  instead  of  over-runs.   When  DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW  is  set,   the
              DUMA_ALIGNMENT  parameter  is  ignored.   All  allocations  will be aligned to virtual-memory-page
              boundaries, and their size will be the exact size that was requested.  To change this  value,  set
              DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW  in  the shell environment to an integer value, or assign to the global integer
              variable DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW using a debugger.

       DUMA_PROTECT_FREE
              DUMA usually returns free memory to a pool from which it may be re-allocated. If you suspect  that
              a  program  may be touching free memory, set DUMA_PROTECT_FREE to 1. This will cause DUMA to never
              re-allocate memory once it has been freed, so that any access to free  memory  will  be  detected.
              Some  programs  will  use tremendous amounts of memory when this parameter is set.  To change this
              value, set DUMA_PROTECT_FREE in the shell environment to an integer value, or assign to the global
              integer variable DUMA_PROTECT_FREE using a debugger.

       DUMA_ALLOW_MALLOC_0
              By default, DUMA traps calls to malloc() with a size of zero, because they are often the result of
              a software bug. If DUMA_ALLOW_MALLOC_0 is non-zero, the software will not trap calls  to  malloc()
              with a size of zero.  To change this value, set DUMA_ALLOC_MALLOC_0 in the shell environment to an
              integer value, or assign to the global integer variable DUMA_ALLOC_MALLOC_0 using a debugger.

       DUMA_FILL
              When  set  to  a  value  between  0 and 255, every byte of allocated memory is initialized to that
              value. This can help detect reads of uninitialized memory.  When set to -1, some memory is  filled
              with  zeroes (the operating system default on most systems) and some memory will retain the values
              written to it during its last use.

WORD-ALIGNMENT AND OVERRUN DETECTION

       There is a conflict between the alignment restrictions that malloc() operates  under  and  the  debugging
       strategy  used by DUMA. When detecting overruns, DUMA malloc() allocates two or more virtual memory pages
       for each allocation. The last page is made inaccessible in such a way that any read,  write,  or  execute
       access  will  cause a segmentation fault.  Then, DUMA malloc() will return an address such that the first
       byte after the end of the allocation is on the inaccessible page.  Thus, any overrun  of  the  allocation
       will cause a segmentation fault.

       It  follows  that the address returned by malloc() is the address of the inaccessible page minus the size
       of the memory allocation.  Unfortunately, malloc() is required to return word-aligned allocations,  since
       many CPUs can only access a word when its address is aligned.  The conflict happens when software makes a
       memory  allocation  using a size that is not a multiple of the word size, and expects to do word accesses
       to that allocation. The location of the inaccessible page is fixed by hardware at a word-aligned address.
       If DUMA malloc() is to return an aligned address, it must increase  the  size  of  the  allocation  to  a
       multiple  of  the  word  size.   In  addition,  the functions memalign() and valloc() must honor explicit
       specifications on the alignment of the memory allocation, and this, as well can only  be  implemented  by
       increasing  the  size  of  the  allocation.   Thus, there will be situations in which the end of a memory
       allocation contains some padding space, and accesses of that padding space will not be detected, even  if
       they are overruns.

       DUMA  provides  the  variable  DUMA_ALIGNMENT  so that the user can control the default alignment used by
       malloc(), calloc(), and  realloc().   To  debug  overruns  as  small  as  a  single  byte,  you  can  set
       DUMA_ALIGNMENT  to  zero. This will result in DUMA malloc() returning unaligned addresses for allocations
       with sizes that are not a multiple of the word size. This  is  not  a  problem  in  most  cases,  because
       compilers  must  pad  the  size  of objects so that alignment restrictions are honored when storing those
       objects in arrays. The problem surfaces when software allocates odd-sized buffers for objects  that  must
       be  word-aligned.  One  case  of  this  is  software that allocates a buffer to contain a structure and a
       string, and the string has an odd size (this example was in a popular TIFF library). If  word  references
       are  made  to  un-aligned buffers, you will see a bus error (SIGBUS) instead of a segmentation fault. The
       only way to fix this is to re-write the offending code to make byte  references  or  not  make  odd-sized
       allocations, or to set DUMA_ALIGNMENT to the word size.

       Another  example  of  software  incompatible with DUMA_ALIGNMENT < word-size is the strcmp() function and
       other string functions on SunOS (and probably Solaris),  which  make  word-sized  accesses  to  character
       strings,  and  may  attempt  to  access  up  to three bytes beyond the end of a string. These result in a
       segmentation fault (SIGSEGV). The only way around this is to use versions of the  string  functions  that
       perform byte references instead of word references.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DEBUGGING YOUR PROGRAM

       1.     Link with libduma.a as explained above.

       2.     Run your program in a debugger and fix any overruns or accesses to free memory.

       3.     Quit the debugger.

       4.     Set DUMA_PROTECT_BELOW = 1 in the shell environment.

       5.     Repeat step 2, this time repairing underruns if they occur.

       6.     Quit the debugger.

       7.     Read  the restrictions in the section on WORD-ALIGNMENT AND OVERRUN DETECTION.  See if you can set
              DUMA_ALIGNMENT to 0 and repeat step 2. Sometimes this will be too much  work,  or  there  will  be
              problems  with  library  routines  for which you don't have the source, that will prevent you from
              doing this.

MEMORY USAGE AND EXECUTION SPEED

       Since DUMA uses at least two virtual memory pages for each of its allocations,  it's  a  terrible  memory
       hog.  I've  sometimes found it necessary to add a swap file using swapon(8) so that the system would have
       enough virtual memory to debug my program. Also, the way we manipulate memory results  in  various  cache
       and  translation  buffer  entries  being flushed with each call to malloc or free. The end result is that
       your program will be much slower and use more resources while you are debugging it with DUMA.

       Don't leave libduma.a linked into production software! Use it only for debugging.

AUTHOR

       Hayati Ayguen

WARNINGS

       I have tried to do as good a job as I can on this software, but I doubt that  it  is  even  theoretically
       possible to make it bug-free.  This software has no warranty. It will not detect some bugs that you might
       expect it to detect, and will indicate that some non-bugs are bugs.

LICENSE

       Copyright 1987-1999 Bruce Perens. All rights reserved.
       This  program  is  free  software;  you  can  redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU
       General Public License, Version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation. A copy of  this  license
       is distributed with this software in the file "COPYING".

       This  program  is  distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even
       the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Read the file "COPYING"  for
       more details.

CONTACTING THE AUTHOR

       Bruce Perens
       1563 Solano Ave. #349
       Berkeley, CA 94707
       Telephone: 510-526-1165
       Internet: bruce@perens.com

FILES

       /dev/zero: Source of memory pages (via mmap(2)).

SEE ALSO

       malloc(3), mmap(2), mprotect(2), swapon(8)

DIAGNOSTICS

       Segmentation  Fault:  Examine  the  offending  statement  for  violation  of  the  boundaries of a memory
       allocation.
       Bus Error: See the section on WORD-ALIGNMENT AND OVERRUN DETECTION.  in this manual page.

BUGS

       My explanation of the alignment issue could be improved.

       Some Sun systems running SunOS 4.1 were reported to signal an access to  a  protected  page  with  SIGBUS
       rather  than SIGSEGV, I suspect this is an undocumented feature of a particular Sun hardware version, not
       just the operating system.  On these systems, dumatest will fail with a bus error until  you  modify  the
       Makefile to define PAGE_PROTECTION_VIOLATED_SIGNAL as SIGBUS.

       There are, without doubt, other bugs and porting issues. Please contact me via e-mail if you have any bug
       reports, ideas, etc.

WHAT'S BETTER

       Purify  does a much more thorough job than DUMA, and does not have the huge memory overhead.  Checkergcc,
       a modified version of the GNU C Compiler that instruments all memory references, is  available  on  Linux
       systems and where GCC is used. It performs some of the same tasks as Purify, but only on code that it has
       compiled.

                                                10-September-2005                                        DUMA(3)