Provided by: apt_2.4.12_amd64 bug


       apt-secure - Archive authentication support for APT


       Starting with version 0.6, APT contains code that does signature checking of the Release
       file for all repositories. This ensures that data like packages in the archive can't be
       modified by people who have no access to the Release file signing key. Starting with
       version 1.1 APT requires repositories to provide recent authentication information for
       unimpeded usage of the repository. Since version 1.5 changes in the information contained
       in the Release file about the repository need to be confirmed before APT continues to
       apply updates from this repository.

       Note: All APT-based package management front-ends like apt-get(8), aptitude(8) and
       synaptic(8) support this authentication feature, so this manpage uses APT to refer to them
       all for simplicity only.


       If an archive has an unsigned Release file or no Release file at all current APT versions
       will refuse to download data from them by default in update operations and even if forced
       to download front-ends like apt-get(8) will require explicit confirmation if an
       installation request includes a package from such an unauthenticated archive.

       You can force all APT clients to raise only warnings by setting the configuration option
       Acquire::AllowInsecureRepositories to true. Individual repositories can also be allowed to
       be insecure via the sources.list(5) option allow-insecure=yes. Note that insecure
       repositories are strongly discouraged and all options to force apt to continue supporting
       them will eventually be removed. Users also have the Trusted option available to disable
       even the warnings, but be sure to understand the implications as detailed in

       A repository which previously was authenticated but would loose this state in an update
       operation raises an error in all APT clients irrespective of the option to allow or forbid
       usage of insecure repositories. The error can be overcome by additionally setting
       Acquire::AllowDowngradeToInsecureRepositories to true or for Individual repositories with
       the sources.list(5) option allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes.


       The chain of trust from an APT archive to the end user is made up of several steps.
       apt-secure is the last step in this chain; trusting an archive does not mean that you
       trust its packages not to contain malicious code, but means that you trust the archive
       maintainer. It's the archive maintainer's responsibility to ensure that the archive's
       integrity is preserved.

       apt-secure does not review signatures at a package level. If you require tools to do this
       you should look at debsig-verify and debsign (provided in the debsig-verify and devscripts
       packages respectively).

       The chain of trust in Debian starts (e.g.) when a maintainer uploads a new package or a
       new version of a package to the Debian archive. In order to become effective, this upload
       needs to be signed by a key contained in one of the Debian package maintainer keyrings
       (available in the debian-keyring package). Maintainers' keys are signed by other
       maintainers following pre-established procedures to ensure the identity of the key holder.
       Similar procedures exist in all Debian-based distributions.

       Once the uploaded package is verified and included in the archive, the maintainer
       signature is stripped off, and checksums of the package are computed and put in the
       Packages file. The checksums of all of the Packages files are then computed and put into
       the Release file. The Release file is then signed by the archive key for this Ubuntu
       release, and distributed alongside the packages and the Packages files on Ubuntu mirrors.
       The keys are in the Ubuntu archive keyring available in the ubuntu-keyring package.

       End users can check the signature of the Release file, extract a checksum of a package
       from it and compare it with the checksum of the package they downloaded by hand - or rely
       on APT doing this automatically.

       Notice that this is distinct from checking signatures on a per package basis. It is
       designed to prevent two possible attacks:

       •   Network "man in the middle" attacks. Without signature checking, malicious agents can
           introduce themselves into the package download process and provide malicious software
           either by controlling a network element (router, switch, etc.) or by redirecting
           traffic to a rogue server (through ARP or DNS spoofing attacks).

       •   Mirror network compromise. Without signature checking, a malicious agent can
           compromise a mirror host and modify the files in it to propagate malicious software to
           all users downloading packages from that host.

       However, it does not defend against a compromise of the master server itself (which signs
       the packages) or against a compromise of the key used to sign the Release files. In any
       case, this mechanism can complement a per-package signature.


       A Release file contains beside the checksums for the files in the repository also general
       information about the repository like the origin, codename or version number of the

       This information is shown in various places so a repository owner should always ensure
       correctness. Further more user configuration like apt_preferences(5) can depend and make
       use of this information. Since version 1.5 the user must therefore explicitly confirm
       changes to signal that the user is sufficiently prepared e.g. for the new major release of
       the distribution shipped in the repository (as e.g. indicated by the codename).


       apt-key is the program that manages the list of keys used by APT to trust repositories. It
       can be used to add or remove keys as well as list the trusted keys. Limiting which key(s)
       are able to sign which archive is possible via the Signed-By in sources.list(5).

       Note that a default installation already contains all keys to securely acquire packages
       from the default repositories, so fiddling with apt-key is only needed if third-party
       repositories are added.

       In order to add a new key you need to first download it (you should make sure you are
       using a trusted communication channel when retrieving it), add it with apt-key and then
       run apt-get update so that apt can download and verify the InRelease or Release.gpg files
       from the archives you have configured.


       If you want to provide archive signatures in an archive under your maintenance you have

       •   Create a toplevel Release file, if it does not exist already. You can do this by
           running apt-ftparchive release (provided in apt-utils).

       •   Sign it. You can do this by running gpg --clearsign -o InRelease Release and gpg -abs
           -o Release.gpg Release.

       •   Publish the key fingerprint, so that your users will know what key they need to import
           in order to authenticate the files in the archive. It is best to ship your key in its
           own keyring package like Ubuntu does with ubuntu-keyring to be able to distribute
           updates and key transitions automatically later.

       •   Provide instructions on how to add your archive and key. If your users can't acquire
           your key securely the chain of trust described above is broken. How you can help users
           add your key depends on your archive and target audience ranging from having your
           keyring package included in another archive users already have configured (like the
           default repositories of their distribution) to leveraging the web of trust.

       Whenever the contents of the archive change (new packages are added or removed) the
       archive maintainer has to follow the first two steps outlined above.


       apt.conf(5), apt-get(8), sources.list(5), apt-key(8), apt-ftparchive(1), debsign(1),
       debsig-verify(1), gpg(1)

       For more background information you might want to review the Debian Security
       Infrastructure[1] chapter of the Securing Debian Manual (also available in the harden-doc
       package) and the Strong Distribution HOWTO[2] by V. Alex Brennen.


       APT bug page[3]. If you wish to report a bug in APT, please see
       /usr/share/doc/debian/bug-reporting.txt or the reportbug(1) command.


       APT was written by the APT team <>.


       This man-page is based on the work of Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña, Isaac Jones, Colin
       Walters, Florian Weimer and Michael Vogt.


       Jason Gunthorpe

       APT team


        1. Debian Security Infrastructure

        2. Strong Distribution HOWTO

        3. APT bug page