Provided by: libmarpa-r2-perl_2.086000~dfsg-8build1_amd64 
Name
Marpa::R2::Scanless::DSL - The DSL for the Scanless interface
Synopsis
use Marpa::R2;
my $grammar = Marpa::R2::Scanless::G->new(
{ bless_package => 'My_Nodes',
source => \(<<'END_OF_SOURCE'),
:default ::= action => [values] bless => ::lhs
lexeme default = action => [ start, length, value ]
bless => ::name latm => 1
:start ::= Script
Script ::= Expression+ separator => comma
comma ~ [,]
Expression ::=
Number bless => primary
| '(' Expression ')' bless => paren assoc => group
|| Expression '**' Expression bless => exponentiate assoc => right
|| Expression '*' Expression bless => multiply
| Expression '/' Expression bless => divide
|| Expression '+' Expression bless => add
| Expression '-' Expression bless => subtract
Number ~ [\d]+
:discard ~ whitespace
whitespace ~ [\s]+
# allow comments
:discard ~ <hash comment>
<hash comment> ~ <terminated hash comment> | <unterminated
final hash comment>
<terminated hash comment> ~ '#' <hash comment body> <vertical space char>
<unterminated final hash comment> ~ '#' <hash comment body>
<hash comment body> ~ <hash comment char>*
<vertical space char> ~ [\x{A}\x{B}\x{C}\x{D}\x{2028}\x{2029}]
<hash comment char> ~ [^\x{A}\x{B}\x{C}\x{D}\x{2028}\x{2029}]
END_OF_SOURCE
}
);
About this document
This is the reference document for the domain-specific language (DSL) of Marpa's Scanless
interface (SLIF). The SLIF's DSL is an extension of BNF. The SLIF DSL is used to specify
other DSL's, and is therefore a "meta-DSL".
The structure of SLIF source strings
The SLIF source string consists of a series of rules, pseudo-rules and statements. These
are made up of tokens, as described below. Whitespace separates tokens, but is otherwise
ignored.
A hash (""#"") character starts a comment, which continues to the end of the line.
Comments are equivalent to whitespace.
L0, G1 and lexemes
In reading this document, it is important to keep in mind the distinction, on one hand,
between L0 and G1 rules and, on the other hand, between rules and lexemes. G1 rules have
a semantics, which can be specified as described in this document. L0 rules simply
recognize symbols in the input. L0 rules do not have a semantics.
Top-level L0 rules correspond to a string in the input. The top-level L0 rules are seen
by G1 as lexemes, and the string to which a top-level L0 rule corresponds becomes the
default value of the lexeme. The L0 grammar can be thought of as similar in behavior to a
set of regular expressions with the lexemes being seen as similar to named captures.
Lexemes are the symbols which form the interface between G1 and L0. Lexemes, like G1
rules, have a semantics. The semantics of lexemes is specified separately from the
semantics of G1 rules, as described below.
Symbol names
Symbol names can be either "bare" or enclosed in angle brackets. Bare symbol names must
consist entirely of Perl word characters (alphanumerics, plus the underscore). Symbol
names are case-sensitive.
The angle brackets, if used, serve to "quote" the symbol name, and will not be part of the
explicit symbol name.
If angle brackets are used, symbol names may also contain whitespace, as in
<op comma>
A whitespace sequence inside angle brackets can include any whitespace character that is
legal in Perl, including newlines. This allows very long symbol names to be line wrapped,
if necessary.
Unlike the angle brackets, the whitespace in a bracketed symbol token does become part of
the explicit symbol name, but it does so in a "normalized" form. Leading and trailing
whitespace in the name is discarded, and all other whitespace sequences are converted to a
single ASCII space character. This means that
< op comma >
<op comma>
< op comma>
and even
<op
comma>
will all be regarded as the same symbol name. The explicit form of that symbol name is
"<op comma>", except that, again, the angle brackets are for clarity, and are not part of
the explicit name.
Explicit, reserved and internal symbol names are often displayed between angle brackets,
regardless of whether the symbol was originally specified in bracketed form.
When a SLIF symbol needs to be referred to by name in Perl code, it is the symbol's
explicit name that is used.
Single-quoted strings
Expression ::=
Number bless => primary
| '(' Expression ')' bless => paren assoc => group
|| Expression '**' Expression bless => exponentiate assoc => right
|| Expression '*' Expression bless => multiply
| Expression '/' Expression bless => divide
|| Expression '+' Expression bless => add
| Expression '-' Expression bless => subtract
Child ~ 'cHILd':i
Single quotes can be used in prioritized rules to indicate character strings. The
characters inside the single quote will be matched in the input, literally and one-for-
one. Single-quoted strings can contain any characters with the exception of single quotes
and vertical whitespace.
Single-quoted strings do not allow "escaped" characters. A backslash (""\"") represents
itself and has no effect on the interpretation of the next character. If a rule needs to
match one of the forbidden characters (single quote or vertical whitespace), it must use a
character class.
Single-quoted strings are always interpreted at the L0 level, but they may be used in
either structural or lexical rules. When a single quoted string is used in a structural
rule, Marpa creates a virtual L0 rule on behalf of the application. This is handy, but it
does have a real disadvantage -- the name of the virtual rule's LHS will be one assigned
automatically by Marpa. When tracing and debugging parses and grammars, these virtual
LHS's can be harder for a programmer to interpret.
A modifier can appear after the string. It must appear immediately after the string, with
no intervening whitespace. Currently only the "":ic"" and "":i"" modifier are availables.
These have exactly the same effect -- they make the string match case-insensitive.
Character classes
<vertical space char> ~ [\x{A}\x{B}\x{C}\x{D}\x{2028}\x{2029}]
word ~ [\w]:ic +
A character class in square brackets (""[]"") can be used in a RHS alternative of a
prioritized rule, a quantified rule or a discard pseudo-rule. Marpa character classes may
contain anything acceptable to Perl, and follow the same escaping conventions as Perl's
character classes.
Character classes are always interpreted at the L0 level, but they may be used in either
structural or lexical rules. When a character class is used in a structural rule, Marpa
creates a virtual L0 rule on behalf of the application. This is handy, but it does have a
real disadvantage -- the name of the virtual rule's LHS will be one assigned automatically
by Marpa. When tracing and debugging parses and grammars, these virtual LHS's can be
harder for a programmer to interpret.
An implementation note: character classes are interpreted by Perl, but this involves
minimal overhead when the parse is of any length. Each character class is passed to Perl
to interpret exactly once and the result is memoized in a C language structure for future
use.
The modifiers allowed after single quoted strings are also allowed allowed after character
classes. Modifiers must appear immediately after the closing square bracket, with no
intervening whitespace. For more details, see the section on single-quoted strings.
Statements
The SLIF DSL consists of a series of statements. The statements are of three kinds, as
indicated by their declarator:
• G1 rules
The BNF operator (""::=""), coming between the LHS and the first RHS alternative of a
rule, indicates that the rule is a G1 rule.
• L0 rules
The match operator (""~""), coming between the LHS and the first RHS alternative of a
rule, indicates a L0 rule.
• Global statements
Global statements are signified by the assignment operator (""=""). The location of a
statement in the DSL source will never affect the result.
Rules differ from statements in that the effect of a rule is sometimes lexical -- that is,
the effect may vary depending on the position of the rule in the DSL source. Some rules
are called pseudo-rules. Pseudo-rules do not correspond to BNF rules, but instead use the
rule format as a convenient way to express other information.
The structure of rules
Every rule declaration consists of, in order:
• A left hand side (LHS). This will be a symbol or a pseudo-symbol.
• A declaration operator (""::="" or ""~"").
• A right side declaration, which contains one or more RHS alternatives. Details of the
right side declaration vary by the type of rule. For each type of rule, the right
side declaration is described in detail below.
RHS alternatives
The right side declaration of a rule will often contain one or more RHS alternatives. A
RHS alternative is a series of RHS primaries, where a RHS primary may be a symbol name, a
character class, or a single quoted string. A list of one or more adverbs is often
associated with the RHS alternatives. Each adverb consists of a keyword, the adverb
operator (""=>""), and the adverb's value.
Within an alternative, primaries may be enclosed in parentheses. A primary enclosed in
parentheses is hidden from Marpa's semantics. A set of parentheses may contain more than
one primary, in which case the entire sequence of primaries is hidden, as if they had been
enclosed in parentheses individually. "Hiding" primaries in this way can be convenient
for primaries whose values the semantics will ignore, perhaps because the value is
constant.
For example, in the following rule
a ::= b (',' c) d action => ::first
there is
• A LHS, in this case the symbol ""a"".
• A declarator, ""::="", which indicates this is a G1 rule.
• A RHS alternative consisting of four RHS primaries. The first RHS primary is the
symbol ""b"". The second RHS primary is a short single-quoted string ','. The third
and fourth RHS primaries are symbols: ""c"" and ""d"". The parentheses around the
second and third RHS primaries "hide" them from the semantics. Marpa's semantics will
see this as a rule with only two RHS values.
• The adverb list associated with the RHS alternative, consisting of a single adverb.
The adverb consists of its keyword ""action"", followed by the adverb operator
(""=>""), and the adverb's value ""::first"".
The rule in the above example is one of a very common type: a trivial prioritized rule. A
prioritized rule is one that contains one or more prioritized RHS alternatives.
Prioritized rules are the only rules which may contain more than one RHS alternative, but
even prioritized rules usually have only one RHS alternative. If there is only one RHS
alternative, as in this case, the prioritization is trivial -- there is only one priority.
Start rule
:start ::= Script
By default, the start symbol of the grammar is the LHS of the first G1 rule. This default
can be make explicit or overriden by using an explicit start rule. The LHS of this rule
is the ":start" pseudo-symbol. Only one RHS alternative is allowed. This RHS alternative
must contain only one symbol name, and that symbol will be the start symbol of the G1
grammar. No adverbs should be associated with the RHS alternative. Start rules must be
G1 rules.
Empty rules
An empty rule is a rule with an empty RHS. The empty RHS, technically, is a RHS
alternative, one with zero RHS primaries. The "action" and "bless" adverbs are allowed
for the empty RHS alternative, but no others. A empty rule makes its LHS symbol a
nullable symbol.
Quantified rules
Script ::= Expression+ separator => comma
A quantified rule has only one RHS alternative, which is followed by a quantifier. The
RHS alternative must consist of a single RHS primary. This RHS primary must be a symbol
name or a character class. The quantifer is either a star (""*""), or a plus sign (""+"")
indicating, respectively, that the sequence rule has a minimum length of 0 or 1.
Adverbs may be associated with the RHS alternative. The adverb list must follow the
quantifier. The adverbs allowed are "action", "bless", "proper" and "separator".
Prioritized rules
Expression ::=
Number bless => primary
| '(' Expression ')' bless => paren assoc => group
|| Expression '**' Expression bless => exponentiate assoc => right
|| Expression '*' Expression bless => multiply
| Expression '/' Expression bless => divide
|| Expression '+' Expression bless => add
| Expression '-' Expression bless => subtract
A prioritized rule contains a series of one or more RHS alternatives, separated by either
the alternation operator (""|"") or the loosen operators (""||""). In a typical grammar,
most rules are prioritized rules, but they are often trivially prioritized, consisting of
only one RHS alternative. For brevity, RHS alternatives are often called alternatives.
Each alternative may be followed by a list of associated adverbs. The "action", "assoc"
and "bless" adverbs are allowed.
The RHS alternatives in a prioritized right hand side proceed from tightest (highest)
priority to loosest. The double "or" symbol (""||"") is the "loosen" operator -- the
alternatives after it have a looser (lower) priority than the alternatives before it. The
single "or" symbol (""|"") is the ordinary "alternative" operator -- alternatives on each
side of it have the same priority. Associativity is specified using adverbs, as described
below.
Discard pseudo-rules
:discard ~ whitespace
A discard pseudo-rule is a rule whose LHS is the ":discard" pseudo-symbol, and which has
only one RHS alternative. The RHS alternative must contain exactly one symbol name,
called the discarded symbol. Discard pseudo-rules indicate that the discarded symbol is a
top-level L0 symbol, but one which is not a lexeme. When a discarded symbol is
recognized, it is not passed as a lexeme to the G1 parser, but is (as the name suggests)
discarded. Discard pseudo-rules must be L0 rules. No adverbs are allowed.
Default pseudo-rules
:default ::= action => [values] bless => ::lhs
:default ::= action => [lhs, values ]
The purpose of the default pseudo-rule is to change the defaults for rule adverbs.
Technically, it has one RHS alternative, but this must always contain zero RHS primaries.
Default pseudo-rules do not affect the defaults for L0 rules or for lexemes. There may be
more than one default pseudo-rule. The scope of default pseudo-rules is lexical, applying
only to rules that appear afterwards in the DSL source.
Currently only the "action" and "bless" adverbs can be specified in a default pseudo-rule.
Each default pseudo-rule creates a completely new set of defaults -- if an adverb is not
specified, the default is reset to its implicit value, the value which it had prior to any
explicit settings.
Lexeme pseudo-rules
:lexeme ~ <say keyword> priority => 1
The purpose of the ":lexeme" pseudo-rule is to allow adverbs to change the treatment of a
lexeme. This pseudo-rule always has exactly one RHS alternative, and that RHS alternative
must contain exactly one symbol. This RHS symbol identifies the lexeme which the adverbs
will affect. The only adverbs allowed in a ":lexeme" rule are "event", "pause", and
"priority".
As a side effect, a ":lexeme" pseudo-rule declares that its RHS symbol is expected to be a
lexeme. This declaration does not "force" lexeme status -- if the symbol does not meet
the criteria for a lexeme based on its use in L0 and G1 rules, the result will be a fatal
error. Applications may find this ability to "declare" lexemes useful for debugging, and
for documenting grammars.
Lexeme default statement
lexeme default = action => [ start, length, value ]
bless => ::name latm =>
lexeme default = action => [ lhs, value ]
The lexeme default statement changes the defaults for lexeme adverbs. It only changes the
defaults for lexemes, and does not affect rules. Only the defaults for the "action",
"bless", and "latm" adverbs can be specified in a lexeme default statement. Only one
lexeme default statement is allowed in a grammar.
Named event statement
event subtext = completed <subtext>
event 'A[]' = nulled <A>
event '^a' = predicted A
The named event statement sets up a symbol so that a named event is triggered when some
condition occurs at a location. Named events can be defined to occur when a symbol is
predicted, when a symbol is completed, or when a symbol is nulled.
A "completed" event occurs whenever a rule with that symbol on its LHS is fully recognized
in the parse. (The idea is that "symbol completion" occurs when the rule, and therefore
its LHS, is "complete".) For the purpose of "completed" events, a nulled symbol is not
considered "complete", and "completed" events will not be triggered for a zero-length
instance of a symbol.
A "nulled" event occurs whenever a zero-length symbol instance is recognized. Null
symbols may derive other null symbols, and these derivations may be ambiguous. Ambiguous
or not, all such derivations cause "nulled" events. Again, nulled events and completed
events are mutually exclusive -- a nulled, or zero-length, symbol is not considered
"complete" for this purpose.
A "predicted" event occurs at any location where a non-zero length symbol would be
accepted by the recognizer. It can be thought of as occurring when a symbol is
"expected". The expectation may or may not come true, depending on future input. Because
there is no physical distinction between expecting a zero-length symbol, and actually
seeing one, "predicted" events are not generated for symbols which are only expected in
zero-length form.
Completed and nulled events may not be defined for symbols that are lexemes, but lexemes
are allowed to be predicted events. A predicted event which is a lexeme is different from
a lexeme pause. The lexeme pause will not occur unless that the lexeme is actually found
in the input. A predicted event, on the other hand, is as the name suggests, only a
prediction. The predicted symbol may or not actually be found in the input.
The name of an event may be either a bare name, or enclosed in single quotes. A bare
event name must be one or more word characters, starting with an alphabetic character. A
single quoted event name may contain any character except a single quote or vertical
space. The whitespace in single quoted event names is normalized in similar fashion to
the normalization of symbol names -- leading and trailing whitespace is removed, and all
sequences of internal whitespace are changed to a single ASCII space character. Names
containing single quotes (which, in any case, are impossible to add using current syntax)
are reserved.
Named completion events can occur during the the Scanless recognizer's read(), resume(),
lexeme_complete(), and lexeme_read() methods. When they occur in the Scanless
recognizer's read(), and resume() methods, they pause internal scanning. Named events may
be queried using the Scanless recognizer's event() method.
Inaccessible symbol statement
inaccessible is ok by default
inaccessible is fatal by default
Inaccessible symbols are symbols which cannot be reached from the start symbol. Often,
they are the result of an error in grammar writing. But inaccessible symbols can also
occur for legitimate reasons -- for example, you may have rules and symbols in grammar
intended for future use.
The default can be specified or changed with a statement of the form:
inaccessible is TREATMENT by default
where "TREATMENT" is one of "warn", "ok", or "fatal".
"fatal" indicates that an inaccessible symbol should be a fatal error. "warn" indicates
that Marpa should print a warning message, but proceed with the parse. "warn" is the
default. "ok" indicates that the parse should proceed without warning messages.
Ambiguity
Marpa parses ambiguous grammars and the design of the SLIF exploits this. A flexible, but
potentially ambiguous, syntax is used. Actual ambiguities are obvious to the human eye,
and users will create them, so that the techniques of this section will rarely be needed.
If and when an actual ambiguity does occur, an error message reports the ambiguity and its
exact location. It will always be possible to disambiguate a SLIF DSL, and there will
always be more than one way to do this.
Separating statements with semicolons
:default ::= action => ::array
quartet ::= a a a a;
inaccessible is warn by default
a ~ 'a'
A statement may be terminated with a semicolon ("";"").
Grouping statements in curly braces
{
:default ::= action => ::array
quartet ::= a a a a
}
inaccessible is warn by default
a ~ 'a'
Statements can be grouped, using curly braces. These do not create scopes -- the curly
braces serve merely to group and to separate groups of statements.
Other ways to disambiguate
There are many other ways to disambiguate SLIF statements. If the ambiguity is between
keywords and symbol names, enclosing a symbol name in angle brackets will force it to be
treated only as a symbol name. And while it is never necessary, statements can be re-
ordered.
Adverbs
Adverbs consist of a keyword, the adverb operator (""=>""), and the adverb's value. The
keyword must be one of those described in this section. The adverb's value must be as
described for each keyword.
action
The "action" adverb is allowed for
• An RHS alternative, in which the action is for the alternative.
• The default pseudo-rule, in which case the action is for all rules which do not have
their own action explicitly specified.
• The lexeme default statement, in which case the action is for all lexemes.
The "action" adverb is not allowed for L0 rules. The possible values of actions are
described, along with other details of the semantics, in a separate document.
assoc
The "assoc" adverb is only valid in a prioritized rule. Its value must be one of "left",
"right" or "group". Its effect will be as described below.
bless
The "bless" adverb causes the result of the semantics to be blessed into the class
indicated by the value of the adverb. Details of its use may be found in the semantics
document.
event
:lexeme ~ <a> pause => before event => 'before a'
:lexeme ~ <b> pause => after event => 'after b'
:lexeme ~ <c> pause => before event => 'before c'
:lexeme ~ <d> pause => after event => 'after d'
The "event" adverb applies only to lexemes and is only allowed in a ":lexeme" pseudo-rule.
It turns a lexeme's pause into a named event, using the name specified as its value.
Applications are encouraged to turn all lexeme pause's into named events, using the
"event" adverb. The allowed event names are as described for the named event statement.
It is a fatal error to specify the "event" adverb if the "pause" adverb is not also
specified.
forgiving
:lexeme ~ <name> forgiving => 1
The forgiving adverb is a synonym for the "latm" adverb.
latm
:lexeme ~ value latm => 1
The "latm" adverb applies only to lexemes and is only allowed in a ":lexeme" pseudo-rule
and a "lexeme default" statement. Its value is a boolean. If the boolean is set it
indicates that a token is LATM. A value of 1 is recommended, which indicates that a token
is LATM. The default value is 0, for reasons of backward compatibility.
LATM means "longest acceptable tokens match". In this, the lexer find those tokens that
are the longest that would be accepted by the G1 grammar. There may be more than one such
"longest" acceptable token, in which case, the lexing will be ambiguous, and the parse
will use all of the matching tokens.
The alternative to LATM, and the default, is the "longest tokens match" (LTM) discipline.
LTM is similar to LATM, except that it takes no account of whether a token would be
acceptable to the G1 grammar. This makes it possible that LTM will find one or more
lexemes that are a longest match, and none of them will be acceptable to G1. When that
happens, the parse fails with an error message. This failure occurs even if shorter
lexemes would have been found using LATM, lexemes which would have been acceptable to the
G1 grammar. This means that matching succeeds more often under LATM than under LTM.
Intuitively, LATM is a longest tokens match that considers context, while LTM is a longest
tokens match that ignores context. LATM is usually preferable. Usually if LATM is
chosen, a parse will want to use the a "lexeme default" statement and use LATM globally.
It is possible to use LATM adverb on a lexeme by lexeme basis. When that is done, the
lexemes marked LATM will match only if acceptable to the G1 grammar, and the lexemes not
marked LATM will match regardless of their acceptability to the G1 grammar.
Whichever token discipline is chosen, all tokens matched will be of the same length.
Shorter tokens will not be considered.
LTM is the default for historical reasons. LTM was the SLIF's original token matching
discipline because it more closely models traditional lexing. Also for historical
reasons, LATM lexemes are sometimes called "forgiving" -- in the original implementation,
an LTM search was always done for all lexemes, and LATM was implemented by "forgiving"
rejection by the G1 grammar, and backing up over the input to find acceptable lexemes.
Marpa now does LATM far more efficiently -- the G1 grammar indicates to the lexer, in
advance, which lexemes are acceptable, and the lexer searches only for those.
name
start ::= number1 number2 name => top
number1 ::= <forty two> name => 'number 1'
number2 ::= <forty three> name => 'number 2'
The "name" adverb applies only to rules and rule alternatives. When specified, it defines
a name for that rule alternative.
null-ranking
S ::= A A A A null-ranking => high
The "null-ranking" adverb applies only to G1 rules (L0 rules do not have a semantics) and
is ignored unless the SLIF recognizer's "ranking_method" named argument is set to
something other than its default. Some rule alternatives can match the same input in
several ways, depending on which symbols are nulled. These different ways of nulling
symbols in a rule are called its null variants. The "null-ranking" named argument allows
the application to control the order in which null variants are returned by the "value()"
method.
If "null-ranking" is undefined, the order of the null variants will be arbitrary. This is
the default, and is acceptable to most applications. For details on using the
"null-ranking" adverb, see the document on parse order.
pause
:lexeme ~ <a> pause => before event => 'before a'
:lexeme ~ <b> pause => after event => 'after b'
:lexeme ~ <c> pause => before event => 'before c'
:lexeme ~ <d> pause => after event => 'after d'
The "pause" adverb applies only to lexemes and is only allowed in a ":lexeme" pseudo-rule.
Pauses take effect during the Scanless recognizer's read() and resume() methods. They
cause internal scanning to be suspended, or "paused", before or after the specified
lexeme. Internal scanning can be resumed with the Scanless recognizer's resume() method.
Applications are encouraged to name every lexeme pause using the event adverb. If this is
done, lexeme pauses can be queried using the SLIF recognizer's events() method. Unnamed
lexeme pauses must be queried using the SLIF recognizer's pause_lexeme() method.
If the value of pause is "before", Marpa will "pause" internal scanning before that
lexeme. No lexemes will be read at that position.
If the value of pause is "after", all applicable lexemes at that position will be read by
G1, and internal scanning will pause immediately afterwards.
A lexeme pause event does not occur, and has no effect, if
• It is deactivated. Deactivation and reactivation of events is done with the SLIF
recognizer's activate() method
• The G1 grammar would reject that lexeme at that location.
• It has a lexeme priority lower than the highest lexeme priority.
• At the same priority, it has a pause value of "after", when another lexeme pause
occurs which has a pause value of "before". In other words, pausing before a lexeme
prevents Marpa from pausing after another lexeme at the same location.
Even with the above restrictions, there can be more than one lexeme pause event at a
location. The pause_lexeme() method will return only one of them, chosen arbitrarily,
whereas the events() method will return all of the named events. This is one of the
reasons that applications are strongly encouraged to specify a name for every lexeme pause
event using the "event" adverb.
priority
The "priority" adverb is only allowed in a ":lexeme" pseudo-rule. It sets the lexeme
priority for the lexeme. The priority must be an integer, but it may be negative. An
increase in numerical value means a higher priority. For example, a priority of 1 is
greater than a priority of 0. A priority of 0, in turn, is greater than a priority of -1.
The default priority is zero.
Where more than one lexeme can be accepted at a location, the lexeme priority limits the
lexemes that will be considered. Only lexemes with the highest priority are considered.
If several lexemes have the same priority, all of them will be accepted.
The only effect of the lexeme priority is on the choice of lexemes when
• all of them would be accepted;
• all started at the same string location;
• all end at the same string location; and therefore
• all have the same length.
Lexeme priorities only have an effect when lexemes are accepted. The intent of this
scheme is to avoid situations where a lexeme with a high priority is rejected, and causes
a parse to fail, even though another lower priority lexeme is acceptable and would allow
the parse to continue.
For example, suppose that ""say"" can be both a keyword ("<say keyword>"), and a variable
name ("<variable>"). Suppose further that the grammar specifies that "<say keyword>" has
a priority of 1, and "<variable>" is left at the default priority of 0. When L0 finds a
occurrence of ""say"", where both the "say" keyword and a variable name would be accepted
by G1, then only the "say" keyword is read by G1, because of the priorities.
But, suppose instead that the parse is at a location where G1 is not accepting the "<say
keyword>". Since only lexeme priorites of acceptable lexemes are considered, "<variable>"
lexeme has the highest priority, and the literal string ""say"" will be read as a
"<variable>" token.
proper
The "proper" keyword is only valid for a quantified right side, and its value must be a
boolean, in the form of a binary digit (0 or 1). It is only relevant is a separator is
defined and is 1 if proper separation is required, and 0 if Perl separation is allowed.
"Perl separation" allows a final separator. "Proper separation" is so called, because it
requires that separators be "proper" in the sense that they must actually separate
sequence items.
rank
unspecial ::= ('I' 'am' 'special') words ('--' 'NOT!' ';') rank => 1
special ::= words (';') rank => -1
"rank" is ignored unless the recognizer's "ranking_method" named argument is set to
something other than its default. The range allowed for "rank" is implementation-defined,
but numbers in the range between -134,217,727 and 134,217,727 will always be allowed.
"rank" is 0 by default. For details on using the "rank" named argument, see the document
on parse order.
separator
The "separator" keyword is only valid for a quantified right side, and its value must be a
single symbol -- either a single symbol name, or a character class. If specified, the
separator must separate items of the sequence. A separator may not be nullable.
Precedence
Marpa's precedence is a generalization beyond the traditional ideas of precedence.
Traditional precedence parsing required the classification of operators as postfix, infix,
etc. Marpa's precedence parsing is NOT based on the special treatment of operators.
For the purpose of precedence, an operand is an occurrence in a RHS alternative of the LHS
symbol. An operator is considered to be anything that is not an operand. The arity of an
alternative is the number of operands that it contains. All arities are allowed, from
zero to the arbitrary number imposed by system limits such as memory and file size.
For example, in the synopsis, the LHS symbol is "Expression". The alternative
(<op lparen>) Expression (<op rparen>)
contains one occurrence of "Expression" and therefore has an arity of one. The "<op
lparen>" and "<op rparen>" are considered operators.
In the RHS alternative
Expression (<op pow>) Expression
"Expression" occurs twice, and therefore the arity is 2. "<op pow>" is considered to be
an operator.
Because for this purpose an operator is defined as anything that is not an operand, Marpa
treats some symbols as operators that would not be considered operators in the traditional
approach. For example, in the RHS alternative
Number
there are no occurrences of "Expression", so that the alternative has an arity of zero --
it is nullary. The symbol "Number" is considered to be an operator.
An alternative with arity 0 is nullary. Precedence and associativity are meaningless in
this case and will be ignored.
An alternative with arity 1 is unary. Precedence will have effect, but left and right
associativity will not.
An alternative with arity 2 is binary. Precedence will have effect, and left and right
associativity will behave in the traditional way. The traditional behavior for binary
alternatives is exactly as described next for the N-ary case.
An alternative with an arity of N, where N is 2 or greater, is N-ary. Precedence will
have effect. For left associativity, only the leftmost operand of an N-ary alternative
associates -- operands after the first will have the next-tightest priority level. For
right associativity, only the rightmost operand of an N-ary alternative associates -- all
operands except the last will have the next-tightest priority level.
Marpa also allows "group" associativity. In "group" associativity, all operands associate
at the loosest (lowest) priority. That is, in an alternative with group associativity,
each operand may be a full expression of the kind defined by the prioritized rule.
"Group" associativity is used, for example, in implementing the traditional function of
parentheses in Marpa. Group associativity is meaningless for nullary alternatives, and is
ignored.
Precedence and ambiguous grammars
Marpa's generalization of precedence works for all grammars that can be defined by
prioritized rules. It is efficient (linear) for all grammars that could be parsed by the
traditional precedence parsing methods. Marpa also allows you to define alternatives not
allowed by traditional methods. Many of these are useful, and most of the useful ones can
be parsed efficiently.
Because of the many forms of recursion allowed, it is possible to define highly ambiguous
grammars using the precedence mechanism. This can occur even by accident.
The user should especially be careful with right hand side alternatives in which all the
symbols are operands. These can be useful. For example, an implicit operation can be
defined using a binary alternative with no non-operands, and this could implement, for
example, the standard notation for concatenation or multiplication. But to do this
efficiently requires either avoiding ambiguity, or controlling its use carefully.
Marpa does catch the case where an alternative consists only of a single operand -- a
"unit rule". This causes a fatal error. Unit rules are easy to define by accident in the
SLIF. The author knows of no practical use for them, and their presence in a grammar is
usually unintentional. Note that, in the event an application does find a use for a
grammar with unit rules, the NAIF and the Thin interface can parse it.
Copyright and License
Copyright 2014 Jeffrey Kegler
This file is part of Marpa::R2. Marpa::R2 is free software: you can
redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser
General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation,
either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
Marpa::R2 is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
Lesser General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser
General Public License along with Marpa::R2. If not, see
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/.