Provided by: erlang-manpages_25.3.2.8+dfsg-1ubuntu4.4_all 
NAME
cerl_clauses - Utility functions for Core Erlang case/receive clauses.
DESCRIPTION
Utility functions for Core Erlang case/receive clauses.
Syntax trees are defined in the module cerl.
DATA TYPES
bindings() = [{cerl:cerl(), cerl:cerl()}]:
cerl() = cerl:cerl():
expr() = any | cerl:cerl():
match_ret() = none | {true, bindings()} | {false, bindings()}:
EXPORTS
any_catchall(Cs::[cerl:cerl()]) -> boolean()
Returns true if any of the abstract clauses in the list is a catch-all, otherwise false. See
is_catchall/1 for details.
Note: each node in Clauses must have type clause.
See also: is_catchall/1.
eval_guard(E::cerl:cerl()) -> none | {value, term()}
Tries to reduce a guard expression to a single constant value, if possible. The returned value is
{value, Term} if the guard expression Expr always yields the constant value Term, and is otherwise
none.
Note that although guard expressions should only yield boolean values, this function does not
guarantee that Term is either true or false. Also note that only simple constructs like let-
expressions are examined recursively; general constant folding is not performed.
See also: is_catchall/1.
is_catchall(C::cerl:c_clause()) -> boolean()
Returns true if an abstract clause is a catch-all, otherwise false. A clause is a catch-all if all
its patterns are variables, and its guard expression always evaluates to true; cf. eval_guard/1.
Note: Clause must have type clause.
See also: any_catchall/1, eval_guard/1.
match(P::cerl:cerl(), E::expr()) -> match_ret()
Matches a pattern against an expression. The returned value is none if a match is impossible,
{true, Bindings} if Pattern definitely matches Expr, and {false, Bindings} if a match is not
definite, but cannot be excluded. Bindings is then a list of pairs {Var, SubExpr}, associating
each variable in the pattern with either the corresponding subexpression of Expr, or with the atom
any if no matching subexpression exists. (Recall that variables may not be repeated in a Core
Erlang pattern.) The list of bindings is given in innermost-first order; this should only be of
interest if Pattern contains one or more alias patterns. If the returned value is {true, []}, it
implies that the pattern and the expression are syntactically identical.
Instead of a syntax tree, the atom any can be passed for Expr (or, more generally, be used for any
subtree of Expr, in as much the abstract syntax tree implementation allows it); this means that it
cannot be decided whether the pattern will match or not, and the corresponding variable bindings
will all map to any. The typical use is for producing bindings for receive clauses.
Note: Binary-syntax patterns are never structurally matched against binary-syntax expressions by
this function.
Examples:
* Matching a pattern "{X, Y}" against the expression "{foo, f(Z)}" yields {true, Bindings} where
Bindings associates "X" with the subtree "foo" and "Y" with the subtree "f(Z)".
* Matching pattern "{X, {bar, Y}}" against expression "{foo, f(Z)}" yields {false, Bindings}
where Bindings associates "X" with the subtree "foo" and "Y" with any (because it is not known
if "{foo, Y}" might match the run-time value of "f(Z)" or not).
* Matching pattern "{foo, bar}" against expression "{foo, f()}" yields {false, []}, telling us
that there might be a match, but we cannot deduce any bindings.
* Matching {foo, X = {bar, Y}} against expression "{foo, {bar, baz}}" yields {true, Bindings}
where Bindings associates "Y" with "baz", and "X" with "{bar, baz}".
* Matching a pattern "{X, Y}" against any yields {false, Bindings} where Bindings associates
both "X" and "Y" with any.
match_list(Ps::[cerl:cerl()], Es::[expr()]) -> match_ret()
Like match/2, but matching a sequence of patterns against a sequence of expressions. Passing an
empty list for Exprs is equivalent to passing a list of any atoms of the same length as Patterns.
See also: match/2.
reduce(Cs::[cerl:c_clause()]) -> {true, {cerl:c_clause(), bindings()}} | {false, [cerl:c_clause()]}
Equivalent to reduce(Cs, []).
reduce(Cs::[cerl:c_clause()], Es::[expr()]) -> {true, {cerl:c_clause(), bindings()}} | {false,
[cerl:c_clause()]}
Selects a single clause, if possible, or otherwise reduces the list of selectable clauses. The
input is a list Clauses of abstract clauses (i.e., syntax trees of type clause), and a list of
switch expressions Exprs. The function tries to uniquely select a single clause or discard
unselectable clauses, with respect to the switch expressions. All abstract clauses in the list
must have the same number of patterns. If Exprs is not the empty list, it must have the same
length as the number of patterns in each clause; see match_list/2 for details.
A clause can only be selected if its guard expression always yields the atom true, and a clause
whose guard expression always yields the atom false can never be selected. Other guard expressions
are considered to have unknown value; cf. eval_guard/1.
If a particular clause can be selected, the function returns {true, {Clause, Bindings}}, where
Clause is the selected clause and Bindings is a list of pairs {Var, SubExpr} associating the
variables occurring in the patterns of Clause with the corresponding subexpressions in Exprs. The
list of bindings is given in innermost-first order; see the match/2 function for details.
If no clause could be definitely selected, the function returns {false, NewClauses}, where
NewClauses is the list of entries in Clauses that remain after eliminating unselectable clauses,
preserving the relative order.
See also: eval_guard/1, match/2, match_list/2.
AUTHORS
Richard Carlsson <carlsson.richard@gmail.com>
compiler 8.2.6.3 cerl_clauses(3erl)