Provided by: libmkdoc-xml-perl_0.75-3_all bug

NAME

       MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder - Builds a parsed tree from XML data

SYNOPSIS

         my @top_nodes = MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder->process_data ($some_xml);

SUMMARY

       MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder uses MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer to turn XML data into a parsed tree.
       Basically it smells like an XML parser, looks like an XML parser, and awfully overlaps
       with XML parsers.

       But it's not an XML parser.

       XML parsers are required to die if the XML data is not well formed.
       MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't give a rip: it'll parse whatever as long as it's good
       enough for it to parse.

       XML parsers expand entities. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't.  At least not yet.

       XML parsers generally support namespaces. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder doesn't - and probably
       won't.

DISCLAIMER

       This module does low level XML manipulation. It will somehow parse even broken XML and try
       to do something with it. Do not use it unless you know what you're doing.

API

   my @top_nodes = MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer->process_data ($some_xml);
       Returns all the top nodes of the $some_xml parsed tree.

       Although the XML spec says that there can be only one top element in an XML file, you have
       to take two things into account:

       1. Pseudo-elements such as XML declarations, processing instructions, and comments.

       2. MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder is not an XML parser, it's not its job to care about the XML
       specification, so having multiple top elements is just fine.

   my $tokens = MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer->process_data ('/some/file.xml');
       Same as MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder->process_data ($some_xml), except that it reads $some_xml
       from '/some/file.xml'.

Returned parsed tree - data structure

       I have tried to make MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder look enormously like HTML::TreeBuilder.  So
       most of this section is stolen and slightly adapted from the HTML::Element man page.

       START PLAGIARISM HERE

       It may occur to you to wonder what exactly a "tree" is, and how it's represented in
       memory.  Consider this HTML document:

         <html lang='en-US'>
           <head>
             <title>Stuff</title>
             <meta name='author' content='Jojo' />
           </head>
           <body>
            <h1>I like potatoes!</h1>
           </body>
         </html>

       Building a syntax tree out of it makes a tree-structure in memory that could be diagrammed
       as:

                            html (lang='en-US')
                             / \
                           /     \
                         /         \
                       head        body
                      /\               \
                    /    \               \
                  /        \               \
                title     meta              h1
                 |       (name='author',     |
              "Stuff"    content='Jojo')    "I like potatoes"

       This is the traditional way to diagram a tree, with the "root" at the top, and it's this
       kind of diagram that people have in mind when they say, for example, that "the meta
       element is under the head element instead of under the body element".  (The same is also
       said with "inside" instead of "under" -- the use of "inside" makes more sense when you're
       looking at the HTML source.)

       Another way to represent the above tree is with indenting:

         html (attributes: lang='en-US')
           head
             title
               "Stuff"
             meta (attributes: name='author' content='Jojo')
           body
             h1
               "I like potatoes"

       Incidentally, diagramming with indenting works much better for very large trees, and is
       easier for a program to generate.  The $tree->dump method uses indentation just that way.

       However you diagram the tree, it's stored the same in memory -- it's a network of objects,
       each of which has attributes like so:

         element #1:  _tag: 'html'
                      _parent: none
                      _content: [element #2, element #5]
                      lang: 'en-US'

         element #2:  _tag: 'head'
                      _parent: element #1
                      _content: [element #3, element #4]

         element #3:  _tag: 'title'
                      _parent: element #2
                      _content: [text segment "Stuff"]

         element #4   _tag: 'meta'
                      _parent: element #2
                      _content: none
                      name: author
                      content: Jojo

         element #5   _tag: 'body'
                      _parent: element #1
                      _content: [element #6]

         element #6   _tag: 'h1'
                      _parent: element #5
                      _content: [text segment "I like potatoes"]

       The "treeness" of the tree-structure that these elements comprise is not an aspect of any
       particular object, but is emergent from the relatedness attributes (_parent and _content)
       of these element-objects and from how you use them to get from element to element.

       STOP PLAGIARISM HERE

       This is pretty much the kind of data structure MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder returns. More
       information on different nodes and their type is available in MKDoc::XML::Token.

NOTES

       Did I mention that MKDoc::XML::TreeBuilder is NOT an XML parser?

AUTHOR

       Copyright 2003 - MKDoc Holdings Ltd.

       Author: Jean-Michel Hiver

       This module is free software and is distributed under the same license as Perl itself. Use
       it at your own risk.

SEE ALSO

       MKDoc::XML::Token MKDoc::XML::Tokenizer