Provided by: libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl_0.17-1_all 
NAME
Test::BDD::Cucumber::Manual::Tutorial - Quick Start Guide
VERSION
version 0.17
Introduction
In this article we're going to jump straight in to using Test::BDD::Cucumber to build some simple tests
for Digest, a core Perl module which provides message digests.
We'll create a "features/" directory, and put our first test case in it, "features/basic.feature" in it.
The contents of it are, in their entirity:
# Somehow I don't see this replacing the other tests this module has...
Feature: Simple tests of Digest.pm
As a developer planning to use Digest.pm
I want to test the basic functionality of Digest.pm
In order to have confidence in it
Background:
Given a usable Digest class
Scenario: Check MD5
Given a Digest MD5 object
When I've added "foo bar baz" to the object
And I've added "bat ban shan" to the object
Then the hex output is "bcb56b3dd4674d5d7459c95e4c8a41d5"
Then the base64 output is "1B2M2Y8AsgTpgAmY7PhCfg"
Scenario: Check SHA-1
Given a Digest SHA-1 object
When I've added "<data>" to the object
Then the hex output is "<output>"
Examples:
| data | output |
| foo | 0beec7b5ea3f0fdbc95d0dd47f3c5bc275da8a33 |
| bar | 62cdb7020ff920e5aa642c3d4066950dd1f01f4d |
| baz | bbe960a25ea311d21d40669e93df2003ba9b90a2 |
Scenario: MD5 longer data
Given a Digest MD5 object
When I've added the following to the object
"""
Here is a chunk of text that works a bit like a HereDoc. We'll split
off indenting space from the lines in it up to the indentation of the
first \"\"\"
"""
Then the hex output is "75ad9f578e43b863590fae52d5d19ce6"
This is a complete test, and if you run pherkin against it, you will get sane output! It just doesn't do
anything ... yet.
In the "features/" we'll add a "step_definitions/" directory, and add our first (and again, only) step
definitions "features/step_definitions/basic_steps.pl" file in it:
#!perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::More;
use Test::BDD::Cucumber::StepFile;
use Method::Signatures;
Given qr/a usable (\S+) class/, func ($c) { use_ok( $1 ); };
Given qr/a Digest (\S+) object/, func ($c) {
my $object = Digest->new($1);
ok( $object, "Object created" );
$c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'} = $object;
};
When qr/I've added "(.+)" to the object/, func ($c) {
$c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'}->add( $1 );
};
When "I've added the following to the object", func ($c) {
$c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'}->add( $c->data );
};
Then qr/the (.+) output is "(.+)"/, func ($c) {
my $method = {base64 => 'b64digest', 'hex' => 'hexdigest' }->{ $1 } ||
do { fail("Unknown output type $1"); return };
is( $c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'}->$method, $2 );
};
When you run pherkin or the Test::Builder-based test which does the same thing
("900_run_features.thttps://github.com/sheriff/test-bdd-cucumber-perl/blob/master/t/900_run_features.t"
in t), we look for a "features/" directory, and search for step definitions files (matched by
"*_steps.pl") and feature files (matched by "*.feature").
The step matchers (the code that starts with "Given", "When" and "Then") are all loaded, and then we
execture the feature files one by one. Let's step through the feature file, and look at how it matches up
to the step definitions file.
Name and conditions of satisfaction
Feature: Simple tests of Digest.pm
As a developer planning to use Digest.pm
I want to test the basic functionality of Digest.pm
In order to have confidence in it
The first non-comment line of your feature file is a description of what you intend to do. You need to
start the name itself with the string "Feature:", and that should be the first line of your file, save
comments (denoted by #).
Anything after that before the next new-line are your conditions of satisfaction. These aren't parsed,
they're treated as human-readable text, and by convention, they're a user story
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_story>.
Background
Background:
Given a usable Digest class
Next up, we have the Background section. The Background is a special kind of Scenario that doesn't have
an explicit name, and should occur only once in your feature file. Its steps are run before the steps of
every other scenario - the harnesses distributed with this distro won't display the Background section
separately, they'll just subsume the steps in to the other scenarios.
This is matched by:
Given qr/a usable (\S+) class/, func ($c) { use_ok( $1 ); };
"Given()" is a function exported by Test::BDD::Cucumber::StepFile that accepts two arguments: a regular
expression (or a string when you don't need to do any smart matching) and a coderef. We use
Method::Signatures to save some typing here, so note that written longer hand, the above might be
written:
Given(
qr/a usable (\S+) class/,
sub {
my $c = shift;
use_ok( $1 );
};
);
If you're paying attention, you might notice that "use_ok" comes from Test::More. Each step is run, from
a Test::Builder perspective, as its own distinct test file. This happens seamlessly, so you can use any
Test::Builder-based testing tools in your step definitions without really worrying about it. There's some
more detail in Test::BDD::Cucumber::Manual::Steps.
The First Scenario...
Scenario: Check MD5
Given a Digest MD5 object
When I've added "foo bar baz" to the object
And I've added "bat ban shan" to the object
Then the hex output is "bcb56b3dd4674d5d7459c95e4c8a41d5"
Then the base64 output is "1B2M2Y8AsgTpgAmY7PhCfg"
The first scenario is delimited from the previous steps by a blank line, and it's called Check MD5.
Scenarios are marked out using the "Scenario:" keyword, and just like the Background section before, it's
a series of steps. These steps rely on the step before, which means we can examine the
Test::Builder::StepContext object $c a little more closely.
Given qr/a Digest (\S+) object/, func ($c) {
my $object = Digest->new($1);
ok( $object, "Object created" );
$c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'} = $object;
};
Creates a step definition. We create a new Digest object, and then use Test::More's "ok()" function to
check that worked. We then put it in the stash for other steps to use. There are three stashes documented
in Test::Builder::StepContext, "feature", "scenario" and "step". As you might expect, "feature" is
available to all step definitions that are being executed as part of a feature, and "scenario" is
available to all steps that are being executed as part of a feature.
The context is the single argument that gets passed to each step, and it contains evertything that step
should need to execute. We'll be looking at some of the methods you can call against it as we look at
other steps, and you can find complete documentation for it here: Test::Builder::StepContext.
This scenario also introduce several ways of starting a step, Given, When, and Then, as well as And.
These are used to organize steps by type, with Given tending to describe setup steps, When describing the
key actions that you're testing, and Then describing the outputs you're looking for. You can find more on
this here: <https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Given-When-Then>.
A step definition you've declared with Given will not match a step starting with Then. You can use the
keyword Step to declare general matching steps in your step definition files, although it's considered
bad practice.
Finally, the keywords And and But are simply replaced with the verb on the line before them.
Scenario Outlines
Scenario: Check SHA-1
Given a Digest SHA-1 object
When I've added "<data>" to the object
Then the hex output is "<output>"
Examples:
| data | output |
| foo | 0beec7b5ea3f0fdbc95d0dd47f3c5bc275da8a33 |
| bar | 62cdb7020ff920e5aa642c3d4066950dd1f01f4d |
| baz | bbe960a25ea311d21d40669e93df2003ba9b90a2 |
The next scenario adds one of the three ways you can provide structured data to your steps, using
placeholders and a table. This scenario is run three times, one for each table row, and with the "
<placeholders" > being replaced by the appropriate row's column. These are called Scenario Outlines
<https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Scenario-outlines>.
Multiline Step Arguments
Scenario: MD5 longer data
Given a Digest MD5 object
When I've added the following to the object
"""
Here is a chunk of text that works a bit like a HereDoc. We'll split
off indenting space from the lines in it up to the indentation of the
first \"\"\"
"""
Then the hex output is "75ad9f578e43b863590fae52d5d19ce6"
While before we were looking at structured data on a Scenario level, we can also provide it on a Step
level, in two ways. Firstly, we can provide multi-line strings, as above, using a feature that is
syntactically similar to "pystring"s, and conceptually similar to HEREDOCs. The contents of the string
will be available to the step definition via the "data()" method of the context:
When "I've added the following to the object", func ($c) {
$c->stash->{'scenario'}->{'object'}->add( $c->data );
};
While we don't have an example of it here, you can also provide tables to your steps, which will also be
available via "data()":
Scenario: Sort Employees
Given a set of employees
| name | wage | hair color |
| Peter | 10,000 | brown |
| John | 20,000 | blond |
| Joan | 30,000 | green |
You can find out more about these features in the Cucumber documentation here:
<https://github.com/cucumber/cucumber/wiki/Multiline-Step-Arguments>.
Next Steps...
That's the tutorial done! You can find out more about writing steps in
Test::BDD::Cucumber::Manual::Steps, the documentation for our simple command-line tool in App::pherkin,
and how to integrate with Test::Builder in Test::BDD::Cucumber::Manual::Integration.
AUTHOR
Peter Sergeant "pete@clueball.com"
LICENSE
Copyright 2011, Peter Sergeant; Licensed under the same terms as Perl
perl v5.18.1 2013-12-01 Test::BDD::Cuc...anual::Tutorial(3pm)