Provided by: auditd_2.3.2-2ubuntu1_amd64 bug

NAME

       audit.rules - a set of rules loaded in the kernel audit system

DESCRIPTION

       audit.rules  is  a  file  containing  audit  rules  that will be loaded by the audit daemon's init script
       whenever the daemon is started. The  auditctl  program  is  used  by  the  initscripts  to  perform  this
       operation.  The  syntax  for the rules is essentially the same as when typing in an auditctl command at a
       shell prompt except you do not need to type the auditctl command name since that is  implied.  The  audit
       rules come in 3 varieties: control, file, and syscall.

   Control
       Control commands generally involve configuring the audit system rather than telling it what to watch for.
       These  commands  typically  include  deleting  all rules, setting the size of the kernel's backlog queue,
       setting the failure mode, setting the event rate limit, or to tell auditctl to ignore  syntax  errors  in
       the rules and continue loading. Generally, these rules are at the top of the rules file.

   File System
       File  System rules are sometimes called watches. These rules are used to audit access to particular files
       or directories that you may be interested in. If the path given in the rule is a directory, then the rule
       used is recursive to the bottom of the directory tree excluding any directories that may be mount points.
       The syntax of these rules generally follow this format:

       -w path-to-file -p permissions -k keyname

       where the permission are any one of the following:

              r - read of the file

              w - write to the file

              x - execute the file

              a - change in the file's attribute

   System Call
       The system call rules are loaded into a matching engine that intercepts each syscall that all programs on
       the system makes. Therefore it is very important to only use syscall rules when you have to  since  these
       affect performance. The more rules, the bigger the performance hit. You can help the performance, though,
       by combining syscalls into one rule whenever possible.

       The Linux kernel has 4 rule matching lists or filters as they are sometimes called. They are: task, exit,
       user,  and exclude. The task list is checked only during the fork or clone syscalls. It is rarely used in
       practice.

       The exit filter is the place where all syscall and file system audit requests are evaluated.

       The user filter is used to filter (remove) some events that originate in user  space.   By  default,  any
       event  originating  in  user  space is allowed. So, if there are some events that you do not want to see,
       then this is a place where some can be removed. See auditctl(8) for fields that are valid.

       The exclude filter is used to exclude certain events from being emitted. The msgtype  field  is  used  to
       tell  the  kernel  which  message  types you do not want to record. This filter can remove the event as a
       whole and is not selective about any other attribute. The user and exit  filters  are  better  suited  to
       selectively auditing events.

       Syscall rules take the general form of:

       -a action,list -S syscall -F field=value -k keyname

       The  -a  option  tells  the kernel's rule matching engine that we want to append a rule at the end of the
       rule list. But we need to specify which rule list it goes on and what action to take  when  it  triggers.
       Valid actions are:

              always - always create an event

              never  - never create an event

       The  action and list are separated by a comma but no space in between. Valid lists are: task, exit, user,
       and exclude. Their meaning was explained earlier.

       Next in the rule would normally be the -S option. This field can either be the syscall  name  or  number.
       For  readability,  the  name  is  almost  always  used.  You  may give more than one syscall in a rule by
       specifying another -S option. When sent into the kernel, all syscall fields are put into a mask  so  that
       one compare can determine if the syscall is of interest. So, adding multiple syscalls in one rule is very
       efficient.  When  you  specify a syscall name, auditctl will look up the name and get its syscall number.
       This leads to some problems on bi-arch machines. The 32 and 64 bit syscall  numbers  sometimes,  but  not
       always,  line  up.  So, to solve this problem, you would generally need to break the rule into 2 with one
       specifying -F arch=b32 and the other specifying -F arch=b64. This needs to go in front of the  -S  option
       so that auditctl looks at the right lookup table when returning the number.

       After  the  syscall  is  specified, you would normally have one or more -F options that fine tune what to
       match against. Rather than list all the valid field types here, the reader should look  at  the  auditctl
       man  page  which  has  a  full listing of each field and what it means. But its worth mentioning a couple
       things.

       The audit system considers uids to be unsigned numbers. The audit system uses the number -1  to  indicate
       that  a loginuid is not set. This means that when its printed out, it looks like 4294967295. If you write
       a rule that you wanted try to get the valid users of the system, you need to look in  /etc/login.defs  to
       see  where  user  accounts  start. For example, if UID_MIN is  500, then you would also need to take into
       account that the unsigned representation of -1 is higher than 500. So you would  address  this  with  the
       following piece of a rule:

       -F auid>=500 -F auid!=4294967295

       These individual checks are "anded" and both have to be true.

       The  last  thing  to  know  about syscall rules is that you can add a key field which is a free form text
       string that you want inserted into the event to help identify its meaning.  This  is  discussed  in  more
       detail in the NOTES section.

NOTES

       The purpose of auditing is to be able to do an investigation periodically or whenever an incident occurs.
       A few simple steps in planning up front will make this job easier. The best advice is to use keys in both
       the  watches  and  system  call rules to give the rule a meaning. If rules are related or together meet a
       specific requirement, then give them a common key name. You can use this  during  your  investigation  to
       select only results with a specific meaning.

       When  doing  an  investigation, you would normally start off with the main aureport output to just get an
       idea about what is happening on the system. This report mostly tells you about events that are hard coded
       by the audit system such as login/out, uses of authentication, system anomalies, how many users have been
       on the machine, and if SE Linux has detected any AVCs.

       aureport --start this-week

       After looking at the report, you probably want to get a second view about what rules you loaded that have
       been triggering. This is where keys become important. You would generally run the key summary report like
       this:

       aureport --start this-week --key --summary

       This will give an ordered listing of the keys associated with rules that have been  triggering.  If,  for
       example,  you  had a syscall audit rule that triggered on the failure to open files with EPERM that had a
       key field of access like this:

       -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S open -F exit=-EPERM -k access

       Then you can isolate these failures with ausearch and pipe the results to aureport for  display.  Suppose
       your  investigation  noticed  a  lot  of  the  access  denied events. If you wanted to see the files that
       unauthorized access has been attempted, you could run the following command:

       ausearch --start this-week -k access --raw | aureport --file --summary

       This will give an ordered list showing which files are being accessed with the EPERM failure. Suppose you
       wanted to see which users might be having failed access, you would run the following command:

       ausearch --start this-week -k access --raw | aureport --user --summary

       If your investigation showed a lot of failed accesses to a particular file, you could run  the  following
       report to see who is doing it:

       ausearch --start this-week -k access -f /path-to/file --raw | aureport --user -i

       This report will give you the individual access attempts by person. If you needed to see the actual audit
       event that is being reported, you would look at the date, time, and event columns. Assuming the event was
       822  and  it  occurred  at  2:30  on 09/01/2009 and you use the en_US.utf8 locale, the command would look
       something like this:

       ausearch --start 09/01/2009 02:30 -a 822 -i --just-one

       This will select the first event from that day and time with the matching  event  id  and  interpret  the
       numeric values into human readable values.

       The most important step in being able to do this kind of analysis is setting up key fields when the rules
       were  originally  written.  It  should  also  be  pointed  out  that you can have more than one key field
       associated with any given rule.

TROUBLESHOOTING

       If you are not getting events on syscall rules that you think you should,  try  running  a  test  program
       under strace so that you can see the syscalls. There is a chance that you might have identified the wrong
       syscall.

       If  you get a warning from auditctl saying, "32/64 bit syscall mismatch in line XX, you should specify an
       arch". This means that you specified a syscall rule on a bi-arch system where the syscall has a different
       syscall number for the 32 and 64 bit interfaces. This means that on  one  of  those  interfaces  you  are
       likely  auditing  the  wrong syscall. To solve the problem, re-write the rule as two rules specifying the
       intended arch for each rule. For example,

       -always,exit -S open -k access

       would be rewritten as

       -always,exit -F arch=b32 -S open -k access
       -always,exit -F arch=b64 -S open -k access

       If you get a warning that says, "entry rules deprecated, changing to exit rule". This means that you have
       a rule intended for the entry filter, but that filter is no longer available. Auditctl moved your rule to
       the exit filter so that it's not lost. But to solve this so that you do not get the warning any more, you
       need to change the offending rule from entry to exit.

EXAMPLES

       The following rule shows how to audit failed access to files due to permission  problems.  Note  that  it
       takes  two  rules  for  each arch ABI to audit this since file access can fail with two different failure
       codes indicating permission problems.

       -a always,exit -F arch=b32 -S open -S openat -F exit=-EACCES -k access
       -a always,exit -F arch=b32 -S open -S openat -F exit=-EPERM -k access
       -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S open -S openat -F exit=-EACCES -k access
       -a always,exit -F arch=b64 -S open -S openat -F exit=-EPERM -k access

SEE ALSO

       auditctl(8), auditd(8).

AUTHOR

       Steve Grubb

Red Hat                                             Apr 2013                                     AUDIT.RULES:(7)