Provided by: manpages-posix-dev_2.16-1_all bug

NAME

       sigtimedwait, sigwaitinfo - wait for queued signals (REALTIME)

SYNOPSIS

       #include <signal.h>

       int sigtimedwait(const sigset_t *restrict set,
              siginfo_t *restrict info,
              const struct timespec *restrict timeout);
       int sigwaitinfo(const sigset_t *restrict set,
              siginfo_t *restrict info);

DESCRIPTION

       The  sigtimedwait()  function  shall be equivalent to sigwaitinfo() except that if none of
       the signals specified by set are pending, sigtimedwait() shall wait for the time  interval
       specified  in  the  timespec  structure  referenced  by timeout. If the timespec structure
       pointed to by timeout is zero-valued and if none of  the  signals  specified  by  set  are
       pending,  then  sigtimedwait()  shall  return immediately with an error. If timeout is the
       NULL pointer, the behavior is unspecified.    If the Monotonic Clock option is  supported,
       the  CLOCK_MONOTONIC  clock  shall  be  used to measure the time interval specified by the
       timeout argument.

       The sigwaitinfo() function selects the pending signal  from  the  set  specified  by  set.
       Should  any  of multiple pending signals in the range SIGRTMIN to SIGRTMAX be selected, it
       shall be the lowest numbered one. The selection order between  realtime  and  non-realtime
       signals, or between multiple pending non-realtime signals, is unspecified. If no signal in
       set is pending at the time of the call, the calling thread shall be suspended until one or
       more  signals  in  set  become  pending or until it is interrupted by an unblocked, caught
       signal.

       The sigwaitinfo() function shall be equivalent to  the  sigwait()  function  if  the  info
       argument  is  NULL.  If the info argument is non-NULL, the sigwaitinfo() function shall be
       equivalent to sigwait(), except that the selected signal number shall  be  stored  in  the
       si_signo member, and the cause of the signal shall be stored in the si_code member. If any
       value is queued to the selected signal, the first such queued value shall be dequeued and,
       if  the  info  argument  is  non-NULL, the value shall be stored in the si_value member of
       info. The system resource used to queue the signal shall be released and returned  to  the
       system  for  other  use.  If  no  value  is  queued, the content of the si_value member is
       undefined. If no  further  signals  are  queued  for  the  selected  signal,  the  pending
       indication for that signal shall be reset.

RETURN VALUE

       Upon  successful completion (that is, one of the signals specified by set is pending or is
       generated) sigwaitinfo() and sigtimedwait()  shall  return  the  selected  signal  number.
       Otherwise, the function shall return a value of -1 and set errno to indicate the error.

ERRORS

       The sigtimedwait() function shall fail if:

       EAGAIN No signal specified by set was generated within the specified timeout period.

       The sigtimedwait() and sigwaitinfo() functions may fail if:

       EINTR  The  wait was interrupted by an unblocked, caught signal. It shall be documented in
              system documentation whether this error causes these functions to fail.

       The sigtimedwait() function may also fail if:

       EINVAL The timeout argument specified a tv_nsec value less than zero or  greater  than  or
              equal to 1000 million.

       An  implementation  only  checks  for  this error if no signal is pending in set and it is
       necessary to wait.

       The following sections are informative.

EXAMPLES

       None.

APPLICATION USAGE

       The sigtimedwait() function times out and returns an [EAGAIN] error.  Application  writers
       should    note    that    this    is   inconsistent   with   other   functions   such   as
       pthread_cond_timedwait() that return [ETIMEDOUT].

RATIONALE

       Existing programming practice on realtime systems uses the ability to pause waiting for  a
       selected  set  of  events  and  handle the first event that occurs in-line instead of in a
       signal-handling function.  This allows applications to be  written  in  an  event-directed
       style  similar  to  a  state  machine.  This style of programming is useful for largescale
       transaction processing in which the overall throughput of an application and  the  ability
       to  clearly track states are more important than the ability to minimize the response time
       of individual event handling.

       It is possible to construct a signal-waiting macro function out  of  the  realtime  signal
       function  mechanism  defined in this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001. However, such a macro
       has to include the definition of a generalized handler for all signals to be waited on.  A
       significant  portion  of  the overhead of handler processing can be avoided if the signal-
       waiting function is provided by the kernel. This volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001  therefore
       provides  two signal-waiting functions-one that waits indefinitely and one with a timeout-
       as part of the overall realtime signal function specification.

       The specification of a function with a timeout allows an application to  be  written  that
       can  be  broken  out of a wait after a set period of time if no event has occurred. It was
       argued that setting a timer event before the wait and recognizing the timer event  in  the
       wait  would  also  implement  the  same  functionality,  but at a lower performance level.
       Because of the performance degradation associated with the user-level specification  of  a
       timer  event  and the subsequent cancellation of that timer event after the wait completes
       for a valid event, and the complexity associated with handling potential  race  conditions
       associated with the user-level method, the separate function has been included.

       Note  that the semantics of the sigwaitinfo() function are nearly identical to that of the
       sigwait() function defined by this volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001. The only difference  is
       that  sigwaitinfo()  returns  the queued signal value in the value argument. The return of
       the queued value is required so  that  applications  can  differentiate  between  multiple
       events queued to the same signal number.

       The two distinct functions are being maintained because some implementations may choose to
       implement the POSIX Threads Extension functions  and  not  implement  the  queued  signals
       extensions. Note, though, that sigwaitinfo() does not return the queued value if the value
       argument is NULL, so the POSIX Threads Extension sigwait() function can be implemented  as
       a macro on sigwaitinfo().

       The  sigtimedwait()  function  was  separated  from  the sigwaitinfo() function to address
       concerns regarding the overloading of the timeout pointer to indicate indefinite wait  (no
       timeout),  timed wait, and immediate return, and concerns regarding consistency with other
       functions where the conditional and timed waits were  separate  functions  from  the  pure
       blocking  function.  The semantics of sigtimedwait() are specified such that sigwaitinfo()
       could be implemented as a macro with a NULL pointer for timeout.

       The  sigwait  functions  provide  a  synchronous  mechanism  for  threads  to   wait   for
       asynchronously-generated  signals.  One  important  question was how many threads that are
       suspended in a call to a sigwait() function for a signal should return from the call  when
       the signal is sent. Four choices were considered:

        1. Return  an  error  for  multiple  simultaneous calls to sigwait functions for the same
           signal.

        2. One or more threads return.

        3. All waiting threads return.

        4. Exactly one thread returns.

       Prohibiting multiple calls to sigwait()  for  the  same  signal  was  felt  to  be  overly
       restrictive. The "one or more" behavior made implementation of conforming packages easy at
       the expense of forcing POSIX threads clients  to  protect  against  multiple  simultaneous
       calls to sigwait() in application code in order to achieve predictable behavior. There was
       concern that the "all waiting threads" behavior would result in "signal broadcast storms",
       consuming  excessive  CPU  resources  by  replicating  the  signals  in  the general case.
       Furthermore, no convincing examples could be presented that delivery  to  all  was  either
       simpler or more powerful than delivery to one.

       Thus,  the consensus was that exactly one thread that was suspended in a call to a sigwait
       function for a signal should return when that  signal  occurs.  This  is  not  an  onerous
       restriction as:

        * A multi-way signal wait can be built from the single-way wait.

        * Signals  should  only  be handled by application-level code, as library routines cannot
          guess what the application wants to do with signals generated for the entire process.

        * Applications can thus arrange for a single thread to wait for any given signal and call
          any needed routines upon its arrival.

       In  an application that is using signals for interprocess communication, signal processing
       is typically done in one place.  Alternatively, if the signal  is  being  caught  so  that
       process  cleanup  can be done, the signal handler thread can call separate process cleanup
       routines for each portion of the application. Since the application main line started each
       portion  of  the application, it is at the right abstraction level to tell each portion of
       the application to clean up.

       Certainly, there exist programming styles where it is logical to consider  waiting  for  a
       single  signal in multiple threads. A simple sigwait_multiple() routine can be constructed
       to achieve this goal. A possible implementation would be to have  each  sigwait_multiple()
       caller  registered as having expressed interest in a set of signals. The caller then waits
       on a thread-specific condition variable. A single server thread calls a sigwait() function
       on  the  union  of  all  registered  signals.  When  the  sigwait()  function returns, the
       appropriate state is set and condition variables  are  broadcast.  New  sigwait_multiple()
       callers  may  cause  the  pending  sigwait()  call to be canceled and reissued in order to
       update the set of signals being waited for.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

       None.

SEE ALSO

       Realtime Signals , pause() , pthread_sigmask() , sigaction() , sigpending() , sigsuspend()
       , sigwait() , the Base Definitions volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001, <signal.h>, <time.h>

COPYRIGHT

       Portions  of  this  text  are  reprinted  and  reproduced in electronic form from IEEE Std
       1003.1, 2003 Edition, Standard for Information Technology  --  Portable  Operating  System
       Interface  (POSIX), The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 6, Copyright (C) 2001-2003 by
       the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc and  The  Open  Group.  In  the
       event  of  any  discrepancy  between this version and the original IEEE and The Open Group
       Standard, the original IEEE and The Open Group  Standard  is  the  referee  document.  The
       original Standard can be obtained online at http://www.opengroup.org/unix/online.html .