Provided by: libgo-perl_0.15-7_all bug

NAME

       map2slim - maps gene associations to a 'slim' ontology

SYNOPSIS

         cd go
         map2slim GO_slims/goslim_generic.obo ontology/gene_ontology.obo gene-associations/gene_association.fb

DESCRIPTION

       Given a GO slim file, and a current ontology (in one or more files), this script will map a gene
       association file (containing annotations to the full GO) to the terms in the GO slim.

       The script can be used to either create a new gene association file, containing the most pertinent GO
       slim accessions, or in count-mode, in which case it will give distinct gene product counts for each slim
       term

       The association file format is described here:

       <http://www.geneontology.org/GO.annotation.shtml#file>

ARGUMENTS

       -b bucket slim file
           This argument adds bucket terms to the slim ontology; see the documentation below for an explanation.
           The new slim ontology file, including bucket terms will be written to bucket slim file

       -outmap slim mapping file
           This will generate a mapping file for every term in the full ontology showing both the most pertinent
           slim term and all slim terms that are ancestors. If you use this option, do NOT supply a gene-
           associations file

       shownames
           (Only works with -outmap)

           Show the names of the term in the slim mapping file

       -c  This will force map2slim to give counts of the assoc file, rather than map it

       -t  When used in conjunction with -c will tab the output so that the indentation reflects the tree
           hierarchy in the slim file

       -o out file
           This will write the mapped assocs (or counts) to the specified file, rather than to the screen

DOWNLOAD

       This script is part of the go-perl package, available from CPAN

       <http://search.cpan.org/~cmungall/go-perl/>

       This script will not work without installing go-perl

   MAPPING ALGORITHM
       GO is a DAG, not a tree. This means that there is often more than one path from a GO term up to the root
       Gene_Ontology node; the path may intersect multiple terms in the slim ontology - which means that one
       annotation can map to multiple slim terms!

       (note you need to view this online to see the image below - if you are not viewing this on the
       http://www.geneontology.org site, you can look at the following URL:
       <http://geneontology.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/geneontology/go-dev/go-perl/doc/map2slim.gif> )

       A hypothetical example  blue circles show terms in the GO slim, and yellow circles show terms in the full
       ontology. The full ontology subsumes the slim, so the blue terms are also in the ontology.

         GO ID  MAPS TO SLIM ID        ALL SLIM ANCESTORS
         =====  ===============        ==================
         5      2+3                    2,3,1
         6      3 only                 3,1
         7      4 only                 4,3,1
         8      3 only                 3,1
         9      4 only                 4,3,1
         10     2+3                    2,3,1

       The 2nd column shows the most pertinent ID(s) in the slim  the direct mapping. The 3rd column shows all
       ancestors in the slim.

       Note  in particular the mapping of ID 9  although this has two paths to the root through the slim via 3
       and 4, 3 is discarded because it is subsumed by 4.

       On the other hand, 10 maps to both 2 and 3 because these are both the first slim ID in the two valid
       paths to the root, and neither subsumes the other.

       The algorithm used is:

       to map any one term in the full ontology: find all valid paths through to the root node in the full
       ontology

       for each path, take the first slim term encountered in the path

       discard any redundant slim terms in this set  ie slim terms subsumed by other slim terms in the set

   BUCKET TERMS
       If you run the script with the -b option, bucket terms will be added. For any term P in the slim, if P
       has at least one child C, a bucket term P' will be created under P. This is a catch-all term for mapping
       any term in the full ontology that is a descendant of P, but NOT a descendant of any child of P in the
       slim ontology.

       For example, the slim generic.0208 has the following terms and structure:

           %DNA binding ; GO:0003677
            %chromatin binding ; GO:0003682
            %transcription factor activity ; GO:0003700, GO:0000130

       After adding bucket terms, it will look like this:

          %DNA binding ; GO:0003677
           %chromatin binding ; GO:0003682
           %transcription factor activity ; GO:0003700 ; synonym:GO:0000130
           @bucket:Z-OTHER-DNA binding ; slim_temp_id:12

       Terms from the full ontology that are other children of DNA binding, such as single-stranded DNA binding
       and its descendents will map to the bucket term.

       The bucket term has a slim ID which is transient and is there only to facilitate the mapping. It should
       not be used externally.

       The bucket term has the prefix Z-OTHER; the Z is a hack to make sure that the term is always listed last
       in the alphabetic ordering.

       The algorithm is slightly modified if bucket terms are used. The bucket term has an implicit relationship
       to all OTHER siblings not in the slim.

       Do I need bucket terms?

       Nowadays most slim files are entirely or nearly 'complete', that is there are no gaps. This means the the
       -b option will not produce noticeable different results. For example, you may see a bucket term OTHER-
       binding created, with nothing annotated to it: because all the children of binding in the GO are
       represented in the slim file.

       The bucket option is really only necessary for some of the older archived slim files, which are static
       and were generated in a fairly ad-hoc way; they tend to accumulate 'gaps' over time (eg GO will add a new
       child of binding, but the static slim file won't be up to date, so any gene products annotated to this
       new term will map to OTHER-binding in the slim)

   GRAPH MISMATCHES
       Note that the slim ontology file(s) may be out of date with respect to the current ontology.

       Currently map2slim does not flag graph mismatches between the slim graph and the graph in the full
       ontology file; it takes the full ontology as being the real graph. However, the slim ontology will be
       used to format the results if you select -t -c as options.

   OUTPUT
       In normal mode, a standard format gene-association file will be written. The GO ID column (5) will
       contain GO slim IDs. The mapping corresponds to the 2nd column in the table above. Note that the output
       file may contain more lines that the input file. This is because some full GO IDs have more than one
       pertinent slim ID.

       COUNT MODE

       map2slim can be run with the -c option, which will gives the counts of distinct gene products mapped to
       each slim term. The columns are as follows

       GO Term
           The first column is the GO ID followed by the term name (the term name is provided as it is found in
           both the full GO and slim ontologies - these will usually be the same but occasionally the slim file
           will lage behind changes in the GO file)

       Count of gene products for which this is the most relevant slim term
           the number of distinct gene products for which this is the most pertinent/direct slim ID. By most
           direct we mean that either the association is made directly to this term, OR the association is made
           to a child of this slim term AND there is no child slim term which the association maps to.

           For most slims, this count will be equivalent to the number of associations directly mapped to this
           slim term. However, some older slim files are "spotty" in that they admit "gaps". For example, if the
           slim has all children of "biological process" with the exception of "behavior" then all annotations
           to "behavior" or its children will be counted here

           see example below

       Count of gene products inferred to be associated with slim term
           and the number of distinct gene products which are annotated to any descendant of this slim ID (or
           annotated directly to the slim ID).

       obsoletion flag
       GO ontology

       To take an example; if we use -t and -c like this:

         map2slim -t -c GO_slims/goslim_generic.obo ontology/gene_ontology.obo gene-associations/gene_association.fb

       Then part of the results may look like this:

        GO:0008150 biological_process (biological_process)     34      10025           biological_process
         GO:0007610 behavior (behavior)        632     632             biological_process
         GO:0000004 biological process unknown (biological process unknown)    832     832             biological_process
         GO:0007154 cell communication (cell communication)    333     1701            biological_process
          GO:0008037 cell recognition (cell recognition)       19      19              biological_process
       19 products were mapped to GO:0008037 or one of its children. (GO:0008037 is a leaf node in the slim, so the two counts are identical).

       On the other hand, GO:0008150 only gets 34 products for which this is the most relevant term. This is
       because most annotations would map to some child of GO:0008150 in the slim, such as GO:0007610
       (behavior). These 34 gene products are either annotated directly to GO:0008150, or to some child of this
       term which is not in the slim. This can point to 'gaps' in the slim. Note that running map2slim with the
       -b option will 'plug' these gaps with artificial filler terms.

AUTHOR

       Chris Mungall BDGP

SEE ALSO

       http://www.godatabase.org/dev

       GO::Parser

       GO::Model::Graph