Provided by: safecat_1.13-3_amd64 

NAME
safecat - safely write data to a file
SYNOPSIS
safecat tempdir destdir
INTRODUCTION
safecat is a program which implements Professor Daniel Bernstein's maildir algorithm to copy stdin safely
to a file in a specified directory. With safecat, the user is offered two assurances. First, if safecat
returns a successful exit status, then all data is guaranteed to be saved in the destination directory.
Second, if a file exists in the destination directory, placed there by safecat, then the file is
guaranteed to be complete.
When saving data with safecat, the user specifies a destination directory, but not a file name. The file
name is selected by safecat to ensure that no filename collisions occur, even if many safecat processes
and other programs implementing the maildir algorithm are writing to the directory simultaneously. If
particular filenames are desired, then the user should rename the file after safecat completes. In
general, when spooling data with safecat, a single, separate process should handle naming, collecting,
and deleting these files. Examples of such a process are daemons, cron jobs, and mail readers.
RELIABILITY ISSUES
A machine may crash while data is being written to disk. For many programs, including many mail delivery
agents, this means that the data will be silently truncated. Using Professor Bernstein's maildir
algorithm, every file is guaranteed complete or nonexistent.
Many people or programs may write data to a common "spool" directory. Systems like mh-mail store files
using numeric names in a directory. Incautious writing to files can result in a collision, in which one
write succeeds and the other appears to succeed but fails. Common strategies to resolve this problem
involve creation of lock files or other synchronizing mechanisms, but such mechanisms are subject to
failure. Anyone who has deleted $HOME/.netscape/lock in order to start netscape can attest to this. The
maildir algorithm is immune to this problem because it uses no locks at all.
THE MAILDIR ALGORITHM
As described in maildir(5), safecat applies the maildir algorithm by writing data in six steps. First,
it stat()s the two directories tempdir and destdir, and exits unless both directories exist and are
writable. Second, it stat()s the name tempdir/time.pid.host, where time is the number of seconds since
the beginning of 1970 GMT, pid is the program's process ID, and host is the host name. Third, if stat()
returned anything other than ENOENT, the program sleeps for two seconds, updates time, and tries the
stat() again, a limited number of times. Fourth, the program creates tempdir/time.pid.host. Fifth, the
program NFS-writes the message to the file. Sixth, the program link()s the file to
destdir/time.pid.host. At that instant the data has been successfully written.
In addition, safecat starts a 24-hour timer before creating tempdir/time.pid.host, and aborts the write
if the timer expires. Upon error, timeout, or normal completion, safecat attempts to unlink()
tempdir/time.pid.host.
EXIT STATUS
An exit status of 0 (success) implies that all data has been safely committed to disk. A non-zero exit
status should be considered to mean failure, though there is an outside chance that safecat wrote the
data successfully, but didn't think so.
Note again that if a file appears in the destination directory, then it is guaranteed to be complete.
If safecat completes successfully, then it will print the name of the newly created file (without its
path) to standard output.
SUGGESTED APPLICATIONS
Exciting uses for safecat abound, obviously, but a word may be in order to suggest what they are.
If you run Linux and use qmail instead of sendmail, you should consider converting your inbox to maildir
for its superior reliability. If your home directory is NFS mounted, qmail forces you to use maildir.
If you write CGI applications to collect data over the World Wide Web, you might find safecat useful.
Web applications suffer from two major problems. Their performance suffers from every stoppage or
bottleneck in the internet; they cannot afford to introduce performance problems of their own.
Additionally, web applications should NEVER leave the server and database in an inconsistent state. This
is likely, however, if CGI scripts directly frob some database--particularly if the database is
overloaded or slow. What happens when users get bored and click "Stop" or "Back"? Maybe the database
activity completes. Maybe the CGI script is killed, leaving the DB in an inconsistent state.
Consider the following strategy. Make your CGI script dump its request to a spool directory using
safecat. Immediately return a receipt to the browser. Now the browser has a complete guarantee that
their submission is received, and the perceived performance of your web application is optimal.
Meanwhile, a spooler daemon notices the fresh request, snatches it and updates the database. Browsers
can be informed that their request will be fulfilled in X minutes. The result is optimal performance
despite a capricious internet. In addition, users can be offered nearly 100% reliability.
EXAMPLES
To convince sendmail to use maildir for message delivery, add the following line to your .forward file:
|SAFECAT HOME/Maildir/tmp HOME/Maildir/new || exit 75 #USERNAME
where SAFECAT is the complete path of the safecat program, HOME is the complete path to your home
directory, and USERNAME is your login name. Making this change is likely to pay off; many campuses and
companies mount user home directories with NFS. Using maildir to deliver to your inbox folder helps
ensure that your mail will not be lost due to some NFS error. Of course, if you are a System
Administrator, you should consider switching to qmail.
To run a program and catch its output safely into some directory, you can use a shell script like the
following.
#!/bin/bash
MYPROGRAM=cat # The program you want to run
TEMPDIR=/tmp # The name of a temporary directory
DESTDIR=$HOME/work/data # The directory for storing information
try() { $* 2>/dev/null || echo NO 1>&2 }
set `( try $MYPROGRAM | try safecat $TEMPDIR $DESTDIR ) 2>&1`
test "$?" = "0" || exit -1
test "$1" = "NO" && { rm -f $DESTDIR/$2; exit -1; }
This script illustrates the pitfalls of writing secure programs with the shell. The script assumes that
your program might generate some output, but then fail to complete. There is no way for safecat to know
whether your program completed successfully or not, because of the semantics of the shell. As a result,
safecat might create a file in the data directory which is "complete" but not useful. The shell script
deletes the file in that case.
More generally, the safest way to use safecat is from within a C program which invokes safecat with
fork() and execve(). The parent process can the simply kill() the safecat process if any problems
develop, and optionally can try again. Whether to go to this trouble depends upon how serious you are
about protecting your data. Either way, safecat will not be the weak link in your data flow.
BUGS
In order to perform the last step and link() the temporary file into the destination directory, both
directories must reside in the same file system. If they do not, safecat will quietly fail every time.
In Professor Bernstein's implementation of maildir, the temporary and destination directories are
required to belong to the same parent directory, which essentially avoids this problem. We relax this
requirement to provide some flexibility, at the cost of some risk. Caveat emptor.
Although safecat cleans up after itself, it may sometimes fail to delete the temporary file located in
tempdir. Since safecat times out after 24 hours, you may freely delete any temporary files older than 36
hours. Files newer than 36 hours should be left alone. A system of data flow involving safecat should
include a cron job to clean up temporary files, or should obligate consumers of the data to do the
cleanup, or both. In the case of qmail, mail readers using maildir are expected to scan and clean up the
temporary directory.
The guarantee of safe delivery of data is only "as certain as UNIX will allow." In particular, a disk
hardware failure could result in safecat concluding that the data was safe, when it was not. Similarly,
a successful exit status from safecat is of no value if the computer, its disks and backups all explode
at some subsequent time.
In other words, if your data is vital to you, then you won't just use safecat. You'll also invest in
good equipment (possibly including a RAID disk), a UPS for the server and drives, a regular backup
schedule, and competent system administration. For many purposes, however, safecat can be considered
100% reliable.
Also note that safecat was designed for spooling email messages; it is not the right tool for spooling
large files--files larger than 2GB, for example. Some operating systems have a bug which causes safecat
to fail silently when spooling files larger than 2GB. When building safecat, you can take advantage of
conditional support for large files on Linux; see conf-cc for further information.
CREDITS
The maildir algorithm was devised by Professor Daniel Bernstein, the author of qmail. Parts of this
manpage borrow directly from maildir(5) by Professor Bernstein. In particular, the section "THE MAILDIR
ALGORITHM" transplants his explanation of the maildir algorithm in order to illustrate that safecat
complies with it.
The original code for safecat was written by the present author, but was since augmented with heavy
borrowings from qmail code. However, under no circumstances should the author of qmail be contacted
concerning safecat bugs; all are the fault, and the responsibility, of the present author.
Copyright (c) 2000, Len Budney. All rights reserved.
SEE ALSO
mbox(5), qmail-local(8), maildir(5)
safecat(1)